Shlomi Lavi /
Jul 14, 2022
We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - Textura or Interlink?
Textura is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Interlink, and Textura is rated higher (90/100) than Interlink (62/100). Both tools offer the same amount of features.
Looking for the right Team Collaboration solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
Textura Corporation Vs. Accupoint Software
Textura Corporation: ...
Accupoint Software: Accupoint Software, is a leading provider of innovative ISO compliance management solutions worldwide. Accupoint empowers companies of all sizes to make optimal decisions that improve profitability and achieve real results in the manufacturing, distribution, transportation and services industries. With integrated solutions that streamline business ...
Who is more expensive? Textura or Interlink?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Team Collaboration software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Textura and Interlink.
Textura price starts at $250 per license , On a scale between 1 to 10 Textura is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Team Collaboration software. Interlink accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 Textura is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Team Collaboration software.
Bottom line: Textura is more expensive than Interlink.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared Textura Vs. Interlink based on some of the most important and required Team Collaboration features.
Textura: Data Import/Export, Basic Reports, Online Customer Support.
Interlink: Data Import/Export, Basic Reports, Online Customer Support.
Target customer size
Textura CPM Enterprise is suitable for large general contractor, developers and owners that are looking
for a construction payment management solution. Customers of the software include businesses of all sizes and types, and there is also no
restriction of industrial background.