Shlomi Lavi /
Apr 22, 2022
We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - Textura or Rocket.Chat?
Textura is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Rocket.Chat, and Textura is rated higher (90/100) than Rocket.Chat (62/100). Textura offers users more features (3) than Rocket.Chat (0).
Looking for the right Team Collaboration solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
Textura Corporation Vs. Rocket.Chat
Textura Corporation: ...
Rocket.Chat: Rocket.Chat is a Web Chat Server, developed in JavaScript, using the Meteor fullstack framework. It is a great solution for communities and companies wanting to privately host their own chat service or for developers looking forward to build and evolve their own chat platforms.
Who is more expensive? Textura or Rocket.Chat?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Team Collaboration software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Textura and Rocket.Chat.
Textura price starts at $250 per license , On a scale between 1 to 10 Textura is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Team Collaboration software. Rocket.Chat price starts at $3 per user/month , When comparing Rocket.Chat to its competitors, the software is rated 2 - much lower than the average Team Collaboration software cost.
Bottom line: Textura is more expensive than Rocket.Chat.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared Textura Vs. Rocket.Chat based on some of the most important and required Team Collaboration features.
Textura: Data Import/Export, Basic Reports, Online Customer Support.
Rocket.Chat: We are still working to collect the list of features for Rocket.Chat.
Target customer size
Textura CPM Enterprise is suitable for large general contractor, developers and owners that are looking
for a construction payment management solution. and Rocket.Chat's target customer size include: Small, medium and large size businesses.