Time Machine is a growing cloud-based Backup software, it is designed to support medium and large size business. Time Machine received a rating of 3.5 from ITQlick team. The software cost is considered affordab...
Compare PricingCompare Time Machine and NovaBackup - Feb 2023
Compare Pricing
Shlomi Lavi / Feb 27, 2023We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - Time Machine or NovaBackup?
NovaBackup is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Time Machine, and Time Machine is rated higher (92/100) than NovaBackup (90/100). NovaBackup offers users more features (8) than Time Machine (3).
Looking for the right Automated Testing solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
Apple Vs. NovaBackup Software
Apple: Apple Inc., formerly Apple Computer, Inc., is an American multinational corporation headquartered in Cupertino, California[2] that designs, develops, and sells consumer electronics, computer software and personal computers. Its best-known hardware products are the Mac line of computers, the iPod music player, the iPhone smartphone, and the iPad tab...
NovaBackup Software: NovaStor develops and markets data protection and availability software. NovaStor products are installed on millions of computers and servers worldwide. Headquartered in Zug, Switzerland, NovaStor’s software products are developed in Hamburg, Germany and Agoura Hills, California USA. The teams at these offices provide advice and technical support t...
Who is more expensive? Time Machine or NovaBackup Software?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Automated Testing software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Time Machine and NovaBackup Software.
Time Machine accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 Time Machine is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Automated Testing software. NovaBackup Software price starts at $2,500 per year , When comparing NovaBackup Software to its competitors, the software is rated 4 - lower than the average Automated Testing software cost.
Bottom line: Time Machine cost is around the same cost of NovaBackup Software.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared Time Machine Vs. NovaBackup based on some of the most important and required Automated Testing features.
Time Machine: Data Import/Export, Basic Reports, Online Customer Support.
NovaBackup Software: Automatic update, Backup history, Backup Password Protection, Complete System Backup (Image Backup), File Manager.
Target customer size
Time Machine Automated Testing Software caters to a wide range of industries that require automation testing to ensure software functionality and efficiency. Everyone has some files that they value and would not want to lose, whether individuals as well as businesses.
NovaBackup
ITQlick rating
(5/5)
starts at $2,500 per year
NovaBackup Software is a network, server, and on-cloud backup solution for all business types and sizes. Its key features include local and online storage all in one, windows server backup, disaster recovery an...
Compare PricingCompare specifications
Time Machine Specifications
| ITQlick Score: | 92/100 |
|---|---|
| ITQlick Rating: |
|
| Pricing: | 4/10 - average cost |
| Category: | Automated Testing -> Time Machine review |
| Company: | Apple |
| Typical customers: | Medium and large size businesses |
| Platforms: | Desktop, Mobile, Cloud |
| Links: | Time Machine review, Time Machine pricing, Time Machine alternatives |
NovaBackup Specifications
| ITQlick Score: | 90/100 |
|---|---|
| ITQlick Rating: |
|
| Pricing: | 4/10 - average cost |
| Category: | Backup -> NovaBackup review |
| Company: | NovaBackup Software |
| Pricing: | starts at $2,500 per year |
| Typical customers: | Start up, Small business, Medium business, Large business |
| Platforms: | Desktop, Cloud |
| Links: | NovaBackup review, NovaBackup pricing, NovaBackup alternatives |
Compare features
Time Machine: 3 Features
Data Import/Export
Basic Reports
Online Customer Support
NovaBackup Software: 8 Features
Automatic update
Backup history
Backup Password Protection
Complete System Backup (Image Backup)
File Manager
Files-In-Use Backup
Individual File Backup
Timeline Recovery
ITQlick rating
ITQlick score
Pricing score
License pricing
Functionality score
Software review
Compare
Time Mac...
ITQlick rating
3.5/5
Score
92/100
Pricing
4.8/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
5
Review
Compare
NovaBack...
ITQlick rating
5/5
Score
90/100
Pricing
5.6/10
License pricing
$2,500 per year
Functionality
11
Review
Compare
Applitools
ITQlick rating
2.8/5
Score
85/100
Pricing
10/10
License pricing
$299 per user/month
Functionality
4
Review
Compare
SpiraTest
ITQlick rating
3.1/5
Score
62/100
Pricing
4.6/10
License pricing
$33 per concurrent user/month
Functionality
6
Review
Compare
Testlodge
ITQlick rating
4.7/5
Score
62/100
Pricing
3.8/10
License pricing
$29 per month
Functionality
5
Review
Compare
Auditor - Shlomi Lavi
Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.