Shlomi Lavi /
Mar 07, 2022
We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - Twitter Archiving or Google drive?
Twitter Archiving is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Google drive, and Google drive is rated higher (99/100) than Twitter Archiving (57/100). Twitter Archiving offers users more features (3) than Google drive (0).
Looking for the right Business Continuity solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
Sonian Vs. Google
Sonian: Sonian’s cloud-powered information archiving platform enables organizations of all sizes to streamline eDiscovery needs, regulatory compliance, and reduce IT costs. Sonian’s archiving services are compatible with email, instant messaging, and social media systems. Sonian provides the only archiving offerings in the market built from the ground up u...
Google: Google Inc. is an American corporation which provides Internet-related products and services, including internet search, cloud computing, software and advertisingtechnologies.[6] Advertising revenues from AdWords generate almost all of the company's profits.
Who is more expensive? Twitter Archiving or Google drive?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Business Continuity software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Twitter Archiving and Google drive.
Twitter Archiving price starts at $3 per license , On a scale between 1 to 10 Twitter Archiving is rated 6, which is similar to the average cost of Business Continuity software. Google drive price starts at $1.99 per month , When comparing Google drive to its competitors, the software is rated 2 - much lower than the average Business Continuity software cost.
Bottom line: Twitter Archiving is more expensive than Google drive.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared Twitter Archiving Vs. Google drive based on some of the most important and required Business Continuity features.
Twitter Archiving: Data Import/Export, Basic Reports, Online Customer Support.
Google drive: We are still working to collect the list of features for Google drive.
Target customer size
Twitter Archiving's typical customers include: Start up, Small business, Medium business, Large business, Private use, and Google drive's target customer size include: Small, medium and large size businesses.