Compare UroChart and InterSystems - Feb 2022

Shlomi LaviShlomi Lavi / Feb 24, 2022

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - UroChart or InterSystems?

InterSystems is more expensive to implement (TCO) than UroChart, and InterSystems is rated with the same score (82/100) as UroChart (82/100). InterSystems offers users more features (4) than UroChart (1). There is a clear winner in this case and it is InterSystems!

Looking for the right Electronic Health Records (EHR) solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

IntrinsiQ Vs. InterSystems

IntrinsiQ: Our comprehensive suite of software and services empowers providers nationwide to gain control of their future.

InterSystems: Hear from thought leaders and customers around the world to help you make better sense of your data and inspire you to achieve more.

Who is more expensive? UroChart or InterSystems HealthShare?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Electronic Health Records (EHR) software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for UroChart and InterSystems HealthShare.

UroChart accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 UroChart is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Electronic Health Records (EHR) software. InterSystems HealthShare accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 UroChart is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Electronic Health Records (EHR) software.

Bottom line: UroChart cost is around the same cost of InterSystems HealthShare.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared UroChart Vs. InterSystems based on some of the most important and required Electronic Health Records (EHR) features.

UroChart: Medical.

InterSystems HealthShare: Customizable Reporting, Mobile Access, Compliance , Medical.

Target customer size

UroChart's typical customers include: Small, medium and large size businesses, and InterSystems HealthShare's target customer size include: Small, medium and large size businesses.

UroChart

ITQlick rating
(4/5)

UroChartEHR® is a urology-specific EHR built to maximize efficiencies. UroChart, which was designed by a urologist, is based on the principle that urology-specific interfaces result in better patient care.

Categories: Voice Recognition, Appointment Scheduling, E-Prescribing, Medical Billing.

InterSystems HealthShare

ITQlick rating
(4/5)

InterSystems technology and solutions power intelligent clinical workflows and real-time decision support wherever care decisions are made. They provide the analytics to manage an organization – or the health o...

Categories: CM Reporting & Analytics, Field Service Mobile Apps, Compliance , Mac EMR and Medical Billing, Patient Portal.

Compare specifications

Compare features

UroChart: 1 Features

Medical

InterSystems HealthShare: 4 Features

Customizable Reporting
Mobile Access
Compliance
Medical
ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
ITQlick score ITQlick Score is a 1 to 100, the calculation is based on pricing, and functionality Vs. alternative solutions
Pricing score pricing Score is a 1 to 10 (10 is high cost), based on the TCO (cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
Functionality score
Software review
Compare
UroChart
ITQlick rating
4/5
Score
82/100
Pricing
4/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
7
Compare
InterSystems
ITQlick rating
4/5
Score
82/100
Pricing
4/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
13
GE
ITQlick rating
4/5
Score
82/100
Pricing
4/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
16
Review
SRSPro
ITQlick rating
4/5
Score
82/100
Pricing
4/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
6
Review
Epic
ITQlick rating
4.2/5
Score
82/100
Pricing
4/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
12
Review

Auditor - Shlomi Lavi

Website Linkedin profile Facebook Twitter

Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.