Shlomi Lavi /
Apr 22, 2022
We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - UXPin or Textura?
Textura is more expensive to implement (TCO) than UXPin, and Textura is rated higher (90/100) than UXPin (60/100). Both tools offer the same amount of features.
Looking for the right Team Collaboration solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
UXPin Vs. Textura Corporation
UXPin: We wanted to make something special for the whole UX community, a tool that fits our design process down to the last detail - and we wanted to make it the professional tool for UX designers (something we all needed). We started with our notepads in 2010 and they quickly grew in popularity, which is why we decided in November 2011 to design a new, m...
Textura Corporation: ...
Who is more expensive? UXPin or Textura?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Team Collaboration software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for UXPin and Textura.
UXPin price starts at $12 per user/month , On a scale between 1 to 10 UXPin is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Team Collaboration software. Textura price starts at $250 per license , When comparing Textura to its competitors, the software is rated 4 - lower than the average Team Collaboration software cost.
Bottom line: Textura is more expensive than UXPin.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared UXPin Vs. Textura based on some of the most important and required Team Collaboration features.
UXPin: Data Import/Export, Basic Reports, Online Customer Support.
Textura: Data Import/Export, Basic Reports, Online Customer Support.
Target customer size
UXPin's typical customers include: Medium and large size businesses, Textura CPM Enterprise is suitable for large general contractor, developers and owners that are looking
for a construction payment management solution.