Compare Visual Performance and ScienceLogic - Nov 2022

Shlomi Lavi

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - Visual Performance or ScienceLogic?

Visual Performance is more expensive to implement (TCO) than ScienceLogic, and ScienceLogic is rated with the same score (62/100) as Visual Performance (62/100). Both tools offer the same amount of features.

Looking for the right Application Monitoring solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

Fluke Networks Vs. AppFirst

Fluke Networks: Fluke Networks offers best of breed solutions that span network deployment, network performance management and troubleshooting, as well as security and performance monitoring. Fluke Networks solutions are trusted by: Network professionals to help them deploy, manage and troubleshoot business critical networks Agencies, Enterprises & Car...

AppFirst: AppFirst delivers powerful, yet simple application monitoring to provide DevOps professionals and Tech Execs with full-stack visibility into systems, applications and business metrics. Our SaaS-based DevOps Dashboard is powered by a flexible big data platform that collects, analyzes and correlates numerous sources of data -- from logs to StatsD to ...

Who is more expensive? Visual Performance or AppFirst?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Application Monitoring software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Visual Performance and AppFirst.

Visual Performance accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 Visual Performance Manager is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Application Monitoring software. AppFirst price starts at $7.50 per node/month , When comparing AppFirst to its competitors, the software is rated 4 - lower than the average Application Monitoring software cost.

Bottom line: Visual Performance cost is around the same cost of AppFirst.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared Visual Performance Vs. ScienceLogic based on some of the most important and required Application Monitoring features.

Visual Performance: Data Import/Export, Basic Reports, Online Customer Support.

AppFirst: Data Import/Export, Basic Reports, Online Customer Support.

Target customer size

Visual Performance's typical customers include: Medium and large size businesses, Customers of the software include businesses of all sizes and types.