Compare Yammer and Beekeeper - Sep 2022
Compare PricingWe publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - Yammer or Beekeeper?
Beekeeper is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Yammer, and Yammer is rated higher (86/100) than Beekeeper (84/100). Beekeeper offers users more features (8) than Yammer (5).
Looking for the right Team Collaboration solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
Yammer Vs. Beekeeper
Yammer: Yammer is a Private Social Network for Your Company.Collaborate securely across departments, geographies, content and business applications.
Beekeeper: Optimized for non-desk workers, Beekeeper’s digital workplace app integrates multiple operational systems and communication channels in one secure hub that is accessible from desktop and mobile devices.
Who is more expensive? Yammer or Beekeeper?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Team Collaboration software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Yammer and Beekeeper.
Yammer price starts at $10 per user/month , On a scale between 1 to 10 Yammer is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Team Collaboration software. Beekeeper accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 Yammer is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Team Collaboration software.
Bottom line: Beekeeper is more expensive than Yammer.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared Yammer Vs. Beekeeper based on some of the most important and required Team Collaboration features.
Yammer: Basic Reports, Chat, Data Import/Export, Online Customer Support, Project Management.
Beekeeper: Chat, Human Resources, Collaboration, Document Management, Project Management.
Target customer size
Yammer is a suitable solution for the communication needs of any business regardless of the size and type. and Beekeeper's target customer size include: Small, medium and large size businesses.
Beekeeper
Beekeeper is a team collaboration software that improves communication among employees by providing internal communication tools for organizations.
Compare PricingCompare specifications
Yammer Specifications
ITQlick Score: | 86/100 |
---|---|
ITQlick Rating: |
|
Pricing: | 2/10 - low cost |
Category: | Team Collaboration -> Yammer review |
Company: | Yammer |
Pricing: | starts at $10 per user/month |
Typical customers: | Small, medium and large size businesses |
Platforms: | Desktop, Mobile, Cloud |
Links: | Yammer review, Yammer pricing, Yammer alternatives |
Beekeeper Specifications
ITQlick Score: | 84/100 |
---|---|
ITQlick Rating: |
|
Pricing: | 6/10 - average cost |
Category: | Team Collaboration -> Beekeeper review |
Company: | Beekeeper |
Typical customers: | Small, medium and large size businesses |
Platforms: | Cloud |
Links: | Beekeeper review, Beekeeper pricing, Beekeeper alternatives |
Compare features
Yammer: 5 Features
Beekeeper: 8 Features
Auditor - Shlomi Lavi
Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.