Compare Zenapply and PX3000 - Sep 2022

Shlomi Lavi

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - Zenapply or PX3000?

PX3000 is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Zenapply, and PX3000 is rated higher (90/100) than Zenapply (80/100). Zenapply offers users more features (4) than PX3000 (0).

Looking for the right Applicant Tracking solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

Zenapply Vs. Penad Pension Services

Zenapply: The "Interview" Before the Interview! With ZenApply, you can turn your application process into a first interview and quickly identify the best person(alities) for your team in a way a standard resume never could.

Penad Pension Services: Founded in 1983, Penad is Canada’s pension administration specialist and a leading supplier of pension and benefit software systems to employers, financial institutions, and governments around the world. Penad takes care of the pension needs of plan sponsors across Canada and internationally with first-tier plan administration, consulting and ac...

Who is more expensive? Zenapply or PX3000?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Applicant Tracking software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Zenapply and PX3000.

Zenapply accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 Zenapply is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Applicant Tracking software. PX3000 accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 Zenapply is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Applicant Tracking software.

Bottom line: PX3000 is more expensive than Zenapply.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared Zenapply Vs. PX3000 based on some of the most important and required Applicant Tracking features.

Zenapply: Benefits Administration, Employee Self-Service, Applicant Tracking, Resume Database.

PX3000: We are still working to collect the list of features for PX3000.

Target customer size

Zenapply's typical customers include: Small, medium and large size businesses, and PX3000's target customer size include: Small, medium and large size businesses.