ContentKeeper - Top 13 Alternatives
Compare PricingContentKeeper top competitors and alternatives in 2021
Shlomi Lavi / updated: Nov 08, 2019
We publish unbiased reviews, our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. Learn more in our advertiser disclosure.
| ITQlick Score: | 55/100 |
|---|---|
| ITQlick Rating: | (3.5/5) |
| Pricing: | 4.4/10 - average cost |
| Category: | Security -> ContentKeeper -> ContentKeeper alternatives |
| Ranking: | Ranked 389 out of 502 Security systems |
| Company: | ContentKeeper |
| Typical customers: | Small, medium and large size businesses |
| Platforms: | Desktop |
| Links: | ContentKeeper review, ContentKeeper pricing |
ContentKeeper is a fantastic tool with many features, but it’s important to make sure you’re choosing the right Security software for your company and its unique needs. ContentKeeper has some strong competitors and alternatives, and there’s a chance that one of them might be a better fit for your company.
Who are ContentKeeper main alternatives?
Here are the top 4 alternatives to ContentKeeper that are worth checking out: VIPRE Antivirus for SMBs, DbProtect for large size business, CloudLock for Google Apps for growing companies, and Gluster Cloud Backup for startups and SMBs.
1. VIPRE Antivirus - Best for SMBs
VIPRE Antivirus is an alternative Security software, VIPRE Antivirus cloud, ContentKeeper can be used on-premises. VIPRE Antivirus, with a pricing score of 3.2 is considered less expensive to implement than ContentKeeper with a score of 4.4.
VIPRE Antivirus is rated 3.7 stars by ITQlick experts, both software products offer a good range of features (VIPRE offers 4 main features).
Compare head to head: VIPRE Antivirus Vs ContentKeeper
2. DbProtect - Best for Large Business
DbProtect is an alternative Security software, DbProtect cloud, ContentKeeper can be used on-premises. DbProtect, with a pricing score of 6.4 is considered more expensive to implement than ContentKeeper with a score of 4.4.
DbProtect is rated 3.5 stars by ITQlick experts, both software products offer a good range of features (DbProtect offers 5 main features).
Compare head to head: DbProtect Vs ContentKeeper
3. CloudLock for Google Apps - Best for Growing Companies
CloudLock for Google Apps is an alternative Security software, CloudLock for Google Apps used on the cloud, ContentKeeper can be used on-premises. CloudLock for Google Apps, with a pricing score of 3 is considered less expensive to implement than ContentKeeper with a score of 4.4.
CloudLock for Google Apps is rated 4.7 stars by ITQlick experts, both software products offer a good range of features (CloudLock offers 4 main features).
Compare head to head: CloudLock for Google Apps Vs ContentKeeper
4. Gluster Cloud Backup - Best for NO Budget or Start up Companies
Gluster Cloud Backup is an alternative Security software, Gluster Cloud Backup used on the cloud, ContentKeeper can be used on-premises. Gluster Cloud Backup, with a pricing score of 3 is considered less expensive to implement than ContentKeeper with a score of 4.4.
Gluster Cloud Backup is rated 4.5 stars by ITQlick experts, both software products offer a good range of features (Gluster offers 5 main features).
Compare head to head: Gluster Cloud Backup Vs ContentKeeper
5. Skycure
Skycure is an alternative Security software, Skycure used on the cloud, ContentKeeper can be used on-premises. Skycure, with a pricing score of 6.8 is considered more expensive to implement than ContentKeeper with a score of 4.4.
Skycure is rated 3.5 stars by ITQlick experts, both software products offer a good range of features (Skycure offers 3 main features).
Compare head to head: Skycure Vs ContentKeeper
6. Webroot
Webroot is an alternative Security software, Webroot used on the cloud, ContentKeeper can be used on-premises. Webroot, with a pricing score of 4.6 is considered more expensive to implement than ContentKeeper with a score of 4.4.
Webroot is rated 3.5 stars by ITQlick experts, both software products offer a good range of features (Webroot offers 5 main features).
Compare head to head: Webroot Vs ContentKeeper
7. McAfee Complete Endpoint Protection
McAfee Complete Endpoint Protection is an alternative Security software, McAfee Complete Endpoint Protection installed on-premises or used cloud based, ContentKeeper can be used on-premises. McAfee Complete Endpoint Protection, with a pricing score of 7.8 is considered more expensive to implement than ContentKeeper with a score of 4.4.
McAfee Complete Endpoint Protection is rated 4.2 stars by ITQlick experts, both software products offer a good range of features (McAfee offers 3 main features).
Compare head to head: McAfee Complete Endpoint Protection Vs ContentKeeper
8. Red Canary
Red Canary is an alternative Security software, Red Canary installed on-premises, ContentKeeper can be used on-premises. Red Canary, with a pricing score of 6.6 is considered more expensive to implement than ContentKeeper with a score of 4.4.
Red Canary is rated 4.5 stars by ITQlick experts, both software products offer a good range of features (Red offers 4 main features).
Compare head to head: Red Canary Vs ContentKeeper
9. HP ArcSight Security Intelligence
HP ArcSight Security Intelligence is an alternative Security software, HP ArcSight Security Intelligence cloud, ContentKeeper can be used on-premises. HP ArcSight Security Intelligence, with a pricing score of 4.6 is considered more expensive to implement than ContentKeeper with a score of 4.4.
HP ArcSight Security Intelligence is rated 3.5 stars by ITQlick experts, both software products offer a good range of features (HP offers 5 main features).
Compare head to head: HP ArcSight Security Intelligence Vs ContentKeeper
10. McAfee Endpoint Protection Essential for SMB
McAfee Endpoint Protection Essential for SMB is an alternative Security software, McAfee Endpoint Protection Essential for SMB installed on-premises or used cloud based, ContentKeeper can be used on-premises. McAfee Endpoint Protection Essential for SMB, with a pricing score of 4.8 is considered more expensive to implement than ContentKeeper with a score of 4.4.
McAfee Endpoint Protection Essential for SMB is rated 4.2 stars by ITQlick experts, both software products offer a good range of features (McAfee offers 3 main features).
Compare head to head: McAfee Endpoint Protection Essential for SMB Vs ContentKeeper
11. Avira Small Business Security Suite
Avira Small Business Security Suite is an alternative Security software, Avira Small Business Security Suite installed on-premises, ContentKeeper can be used on-premises. Avira Small Business Security Suite, with a pricing score of 7 is considered more expensive to implement than ContentKeeper with a score of 4.4.
Avira Small Business Security Suite is rated 4.3 stars by ITQlick experts, both software products offer a good range of features (Avira offers 3 main features).
Compare head to head: Avira Small Business Security Suite Vs ContentKeeper
12. Easy Solutions
Easy Solutions is an alternative Security software, Easy Solutions installed on-premises, ContentKeeper can be used on-premises. Easy Solutions, with a pricing score of 6 is considered more expensive to implement than ContentKeeper with a score of 4.4.
Easy Solutions is rated 4.5 stars by ITQlick experts, both software products offer a good range of features (Easy offers 3 main features).
Compare head to head: Easy Solutions Vs ContentKeeper
13. Panda Cloud Protection
Panda Cloud Protection is an alternative Security software, Panda Cloud Protection used on the cloud, ContentKeeper can be used on-premises. Panda Cloud Protection, with a pricing score of 6.4 is considered more expensive to implement than ContentKeeper with a score of 4.4.
Panda Cloud Protection is rated 4.8 stars by ITQlick experts, both software products offer a good range of features (Panda offers 5 main features).
Compare head to head: Panda Cloud Protection Vs ContentKeeper
Author
Shlomi Lavi
Shlomi holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information System Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 15 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant, and implementation expert for small, medium and large size (global) companies.