Compare LearnUpon and BuilderTREND - Jan 2023

Shlomi LaviShlomi Lavi / Jan 02, 2023

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - LearnUpon or BuilderTREND?

LearnUpon is more expensive to implement (TCO) than BuilderTREND, and BuilderTREND is rated higher (97/100) than LearnUpon (76/100). BuilderTREND offers users more features (18) than LearnUpon (6). There is a clear winner in this case and it is BuilderTREND!

Looking for the right LMS solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

LearnUpon Vs. BUILDERTREND SOLUTIONS, INC.

LearnUpon: Founded by a team of experienced industry professionals in late 2010 LearnUpon was designed and developed to address the pain-points associated with traditional learning management systems. LearnUpon is quick and easy to setup, no technical skills are required. Our aim was to have our customers delivering courses online to their learners within an ...

BUILDERTREND SOLUTIONS, INC.: BuilderTREND provides web-based home builder software to optimize communication between the builders, their customers, vendors, and subcontractors.The BuilderTREND web-based project management software empowers home builders and remodelers to provide a better building experience for their homebuyers, associates, and subcontractors. The system provi...

Who is more expensive? LearnUpon or BuilderTREND?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of LMS software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for LearnUpon and BuilderTREND.

LearnUpon price starts at $1 per month , On a scale between 1 to 10 LearnUpon is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of LMS software. BuilderTREND price starts at $99 per month , When comparing BuilderTREND to its competitors, the software is rated 2 - much lower than the average LMS software cost.

Bottom line: LearnUpon cost is around the same cost of BuilderTREND.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared LearnUpon Vs. BuilderTREND based on some of the most important and required LMS features.

LearnUpon: LMS, Content Management, Course Authoring, eLearning, Virtual Classroom, eCommerce.

BuilderTREND: Budget & Expense Management, Collaboration, Document Management, Project Management, Scheduling.

Target customer size

LearnUpon is suitable for training companies, software companies and fast growing businesses. BuilderTREND is perfect for construction firms of all types as well as dimensions, from remodelers and household contractors to production home building contractors and also layout or construction business that want streamlining their building procedure and their cooperation with affiliates, buyers and subcontractors.

LearnUpon

ITQlick rating
(4.9/5)

starts at $1 per month

LearnUpon software is a cloud-based, learning management and online training solution that helps businesses to their staff, customers, and partners. It allows them to track, manage, as well as achieve their lea...

Categories: Video Conferencing, Content Management, Cloud LMS, Employee Management.

BuilderTREND

ITQlick rating
(4.5/5)

starts at $99 per month

BuilderTREND is a cloud-based construction management solution that is designed to be used by professional individuals and well as businesses in the construction industry. The software is designed with features...

Categories: SIP Clients, Construction, Construction Apps, Construction Project Scheduling, Electrician Apps.

Compare specifications

Compare features

LearnUpon: 6 Features

LMS
Content Management
Course Authoring
eLearning
Virtual Classroom
eCommerce

BuilderTREND: 18 Features

Budget & Expense Management
Collaboration
Document Management
Project Management
Scheduling
Collaboration Management
Functions with e-Mail Systems
Mobile Access
Accounting Management
Bidding
Change Orders
Cost Management
Document Management
Electrical
Estimating
Project Management
Punch List
Scheduling
ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
ITQlick score ITQlick Score is a 1 to 100, the calculation is based on pricing, and functionality Vs. alternative solutions
Pricing score pricing Score is a 1 to 10 (10 is high cost), based on the TCO (cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
Functionality score
Software review
Compare
LearnUpon
ITQlick rating
4.9/5
Score
76/100
Pricing
2.8/10
License pricing
$1 per month
Functionality
18
Compare
BuilderTREND
ITQlick rating
4.5/5
Score
97/100
Pricing
2/10
License pricing
$99 per month
Functionality
31
Coassemb...
ITQlick rating
4.6/5
Score
94/100
Pricing
3/10
License pricing
$50 per month
Functionality
4
coggno t...
ITQlick rating
4.6/5
Score
92/100
Pricing
6.6/10
License pricing
$199 per month
Functionality
16
Finalsit...
ITQlick rating
4.8/5
Score
92/100
Pricing
6/10
License pricing
$3,000 per license
Functionality
3

Auditor - Shlomi Lavi

Website Linkedin profile Facebook Twitter

Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.