Shlomi Lavi / May 31, 2022We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
mite is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Harvest, and Harvest is rated higher (90/100) than mite (62/100). Harvest offers users more features (6) than mite (3). There is a clear winner in this case and it is Harvest!
Looking for the right Time Tracking solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
YOLK: Time tracking is vital for invoicing, accounting, and scheduling. Yes, it’s been an annoying necessity for all too long. Let’s strike back. With an advanced, yet simple tool to help you get things done: mite.
HARVEST: We believe software should be useful, simple, and fast – so you can work better, get more accomplished, and make smarter decisions for your business.Harvest was founded by Danny Wen and Shawn Liu in 2006, at a small office in downtown New York City. During the years leading up to launching Harvest, we ran a web design studio called Iridesco. As our...
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Time Tracking software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for mite and Harvest.
mite price starts at $5.38 per user/month , On a scale between 1 to 10 mite is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Time Tracking software. Harvest price starts at $12 per seat/month , When comparing Harvest to its competitors, the software is rated 2 - much lower than the average Time Tracking software cost.
Bottom line: mite is more expensive than Harvest.
We've compared mite Vs. Harvest based on some of the most important and required Time Tracking features.
mite: Data Import/Export, Basic Reports, Online Customer Support.
Harvest: Billing & Invoicing, Sales Reporting, Project Management, Time Tracking by Client, Expense Management.
mite's typical customers include: Small businesses and start ups, The software is suitable for the time tracking needs of any business regardless of the type and size.
starts at $5.38 per user/month
mite is a growing cloud-based Budgeting-Forecasting software, it is designed to support small and medium size business. mite received a rating of 3.9 from ITQlick team. The software cost is considered average ...
Compare Pricing| ITQlick Score: | 62/100 |
|---|---|
| ITQlick Rating: |
|
| Pricing: | 4/10 - average cost |
| Category: | Time Tracking -> mite review |
| Company: | YOLK |
| Pricing: | starts at $5.38 per user/month |
| Typical customers: | Small businesses and start ups |
| Platforms: | Desktop, Cloud |
| Links: | mite review, mite pricing, mite alternatives |
| ITQlick Score: | 90/100 |
|---|---|
| ITQlick Rating: |
|
| Pricing: | 2/10 - low cost |
| Category: | Time Tracking -> Harvest review |
| Company: | HARVEST |
| Pricing: | starts at $12 per seat/month |
| Typical customers: | Small, medium and large size businesses |
| Platforms: | Mobile, Cloud |
| Links: | Harvest review, Harvest pricing, Harvest alternatives |
Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.