Shlomi Lavi /
Feb 27, 2023
We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - Arctor File Repository or Time Machine?
Arctor File Repository is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Time Machine, and Time Machine is rated higher (92/100) than Arctor File Repository (62/100). Both tools offer the same amount of features.
Looking for the right Backup solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
byteplant Vs. Apple
byteplant: Since 2003, Byteplant has quickly gained international success and a worldwide reputation as a provider of highly effective, cost efficient and easy to use email security and email management solutions. Our software products and services are used by customers of all sizes from small businesses to large publicly listed companies and government agenc...
Apple: Apple Inc., formerly Apple Computer, Inc., is an American multinational corporation headquartered in Cupertino, California[2] that designs, develops, and sells consumer electronics, computer software and personal computers. Its best-known hardware products are the Mac line of computers, the iPod music player, the iPhone smartphone, and the iPad tab...
Who is more expensive? Arctor File Repository or Time Machine?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Backup software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Arctor File Repository and Time Machine.
Arctor File Repository price starts at $103.35 per license , On a scale between 1 to 10 Arctor File Repository is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Backup software. Time Machine accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 Arctor File Repository is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Backup software.
Bottom line: Arctor File Repository cost is around the same cost of Time Machine.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared Arctor File Repository Vs. Time Machine based on some of the most important and required Backup features.
Arctor File Repository: Data Import/Export, Basic Reports, Online Customer Support.
Time Machine: Data Import/Export, Basic Reports, Online Customer Support.
Target customer size
Arctor File Repository's typical customers include: Start up, Small business, Medium business, Large business,
Time Machine Automated Testing Software caters to a wide range of industries that require automation testing to ensure software functionality and efficiency.