Compare Bullhorn ATS & CRM and fishtank - Dec 2022

Shlomi Lavi

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - Bullhorn ATS & CRM or fishtank?

fishtank is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Bullhorn ATS & CRM, and Bullhorn ATS & CRM is rated higher (97/100) than fishtank (62/100). Bullhorn ATS & CRM offers users more features (5) than fishtank (0). There is a clear winner in this case and it is Bullhorn ATS & CRM!

Looking for the right Applicant Tracking solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

Bullhorn, Inc Vs. graylink

Bullhorn, Inc: Bullhorn is an international recruitment software company, delivering best-of-breed technology solutions for the world’s leading recruitment firms. Founded in 1999, Bullhorn pioneered the software-as-a-service (SaaS) model for staffing and recruiting software, as well as innovations in mobile, candidate search, open API access, and social recruitin...

graylink: Established in 2002, we’re a team of highly talented, motivated and capable people. Our primary focus is developing secure, useful and usable software for corporate recruitment. We’re privately owned. Our head office is in Cape Town, South Africa and we have channel partners in select markets worldwide. Whilst our market focus is predominantly E...

Who is more expensive? Bullhorn ATS & CRM or fishtank?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Applicant Tracking software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Bullhorn ATS & CRM and fishtank.

Bullhorn ATS & CRM price starts at $99 per user/month , On a scale between 1 to 10 Bullhorn Staffing and Recruiting Software is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Applicant Tracking software. fishtank accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 Bullhorn Staffing and Recruiting Software is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Applicant Tracking software.

Bottom line: fishtank is more expensive than Bullhorn ATS & CRM.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared Bullhorn ATS & CRM Vs. fishtank based on some of the most important and required Applicant Tracking features.

Bullhorn ATS & CRM: Billing & Invoicing, Applicant Tracking, Resume Database, Customer Relationship Management, Payroll.

fishtank: We are still working to collect the list of features for fishtank.

Target customer size

Bullhorn ATS & CRM's typical customers include: Small, medium and large size businesses, Customers of the software include businesses of all sizes and a variety of types.