Compare Bullhorn ATS & CRM and TribePad Applicant Tracking - Sep 2022

Shlomi Lavi

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - Bullhorn ATS & CRM or TribePad Applicant Tracking?

TribePad Applicant Tracking is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Bullhorn ATS & CRM, and Bullhorn ATS & CRM is rated higher (97/100) than TribePad Applicant Tracking (80/100). Bullhorn ATS & CRM offers users more features (5) than TribePad Applicant Tracking (2). There is a clear winner in this case and it is Bullhorn ATS & CRM!

Looking for the right Applicant Tracking solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

Bullhorn, Inc Vs. TribePad - Social ATS

Bullhorn, Inc: Bullhorn is an international recruitment software company, delivering best-of-breed technology solutions for the world’s leading recruitment firms. Founded in 1999, Bullhorn pioneered the software-as-a-service (SaaS) model for staffing and recruiting software, as well as innovations in mobile, candidate search, open API access, and social recruitin...

TribePad - Social ATS: TribePad will help your business attract, engage and accommodate a rapidly changing workforce. Our Applicant Tracking Software is trusted and used by leading companies- saving them time and money whilst enhancing their brand. TribePad is an industry award winning Applicant Tracking System. Our proven recruitment software gives you the opportunity t...

Who is more expensive? Bullhorn ATS & CRM or TribePad Applicant Tracking?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Applicant Tracking software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Bullhorn ATS & CRM and TribePad Applicant Tracking.

Bullhorn ATS & CRM price starts at $99 per user/month , On a scale between 1 to 10 Bullhorn Staffing and Recruiting Software is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Applicant Tracking software. TribePad Applicant Tracking price starts at $1,500 per month , When comparing TribePad Applicant Tracking to its competitors, the software is rated 6 - similar to the average Applicant Tracking software cost.

Bottom line: TribePad Applicant Tracking is more expensive than Bullhorn ATS & CRM.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared Bullhorn ATS & CRM Vs. TribePad Applicant Tracking based on some of the most important and required Applicant Tracking features.

Bullhorn ATS & CRM: Billing & Invoicing, Applicant Tracking, Resume Database, Customer Relationship Management, Payroll.

TribePad Applicant Tracking: Applicant Tracking, Resume Database.

Target customer size

Bullhorn ATS & CRM's typical customers include: Small, medium and large size businesses, and TribePad Applicant Tracking's target customer size include: Medium and large size businesses.