Compare ClockShark and ExakTime - Mar 2022
Compare PricingWe publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - ClockShark or ExakTime?
ClockShark is more expensive to implement (TCO) than ExakTime, and ClockShark is rated higher (91/100) than ExakTime (77/100). ClockShark offers users more features (10) than ExakTime (0).
Looking for the right Time-sheet entry solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
ClockShark Vs. Exaktime, Inc.
ClockShark: For field service and construction companies who want to get rid of paper time sheets, ClockShark is the GPS time tracking and scheduling app that is both powerful and easy to use. ClockShark makes payroll painless and accurate. It also makes getting schedules to employees in the field fast and easy.
Exaktime, Inc.: At ExakTime, we have one goal in mind: Make your business successful with easy-to-use time and attendance solutions. We're committed to creating user friendly products and services that eliminate the need for handwritten, paper time cards at your job sites.
Who is more expensive? ClockShark or ExakTime?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Time-sheet entry software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for ClockShark and ExakTime.
ClockShark price starts at $3 per user/month , On a scale between 1 to 10 ClockShark is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Time-sheet entry software. ExakTime price starts at $8 per user/month , When comparing ExakTime to its competitors, the software is rated 2 - much lower than the average Time-sheet entry software cost.
Bottom line: ClockShark is more expensive than ExakTime.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared ClockShark Vs. ExakTime based on some of the most important and required Time-sheet entry features.
ClockShark: Mobile Access, Data Analysis Tools, Automated Scheduling, Employee Scheduling, Hourly Employee Tracking, Offline Timesheets, Online Timesheets, Scheduling.
ExakTime: We are still working to collect the list of features for ExakTime.
Target customer size
ClockShark's typical customers include: SMBs, and ExakTime's target customer size include: SMBs.
Compare specifications
ClockShark Specifications
ITQlick Score: | 91/100 |
---|---|
ITQlick Rating: |
|
Pricing: | 4/10 - average cost |
Category: | Time-sheet entry -> ClockShark review |
Company: | ClockShark |
Pricing: | starts at $3 per user/month |
Typical customers: | SMBs |
Platforms: | Desktop, Mobile, Cloud |
Links: | ClockShark review, ClockShark pricing, ClockShark alternatives |
ExakTime Specifications
ITQlick Score: | 77/100 |
---|---|
ITQlick Rating: |
|
Pricing: | 2/10 - low cost |
Category: | Time-sheet entry -> ExakTime review |
Company: | Exaktime, Inc. |
Pricing: | starts at $8 per user/month |
Typical customers: | SMBs |
Platforms: | Cloud |
Links: | ExakTime review, ExakTime pricing, ExakTime alternatives |
Compare features
ClockShark: 10 Features
ExakTime: 0 Features
Auditor - Shlomi Lavi
Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.