COMPAS for Staffing Vs GoHire (Jul 2020)

Shlomi LaviShlomi Lavi / Jul 24, 2020

We publish unbiased reviews, our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. Learn more in our advertiser disclosure.

COMPAS for Staffing

ITQlick rating
(4/5)

starts at $39 per user/month

Avionte Staffing (formerly COMPAS for Staffing) is a cloud-hosted, Software-as-a-Service enterprise staffing & recruiting solution designed for IT teams and professional recruiting firms. The two platforms, (CO...

Categories: Billing & Invoicing, CRM, Self-Service Portal, Applicant Sources & Marketplace.

GoHire

ITQlick rating
(4.3/5)

starts at $60 per month

GoHire is a web-based recruitment software offering paperless hiring and onboarding features specially designed for restaurant industry. This software can help you to attract and bring new talent faster for com...

Categories: Budgeting & CPM, Costing, Financial reporting, Data Analysis Tools, Applicant Tracking.

Compare specifications

GoHire Specifications

ITQlick Score: 89/100
ITQlick Rating: (4.3/5)
Pricing: 2/10 - low cost
Category: Recruitment -> GoHire
Company: HotSchedules
Pricing: starts at $60 per month
Typical customers: Small, medium and large size businesses
Platforms: Desktop, Mobile, Cloud
Links: GoHire review, GoHire pricing, GoHire alternatives

Compare features

COMPAS for Staffing: 11 Features

Appraisal Performance
Benefits Administration
HR Management
Recruiting
Billing & Invoicing
Email Integration
Recruiting Management
Resume Database
Customer Relationship Management
Lead Management
Sales Management

GoHire: 15 Features

Appraisal Performance
Benefits Administration
HR Management
LMS
Performance Record
Recruiting
Timesheet
Applicant Tracking
Document Management
Email Integration
Email Notifications
Mobile Access
Recruiting Management
Recruiting Management
Resume Database

Bottom Line: Which is Better - COMPAS for Staffing or GoHire?

GoHire is more expensive to implement (TCO - Total Cost of Ownership) than COMPAS for Staffing, COMPAS for Staffing is rated higher (91/100) than GoHire (89/100). GoHire offers more features (15) to their users than COMPAS for Staffing (11).

Looking for the right Recruitment solution for your business? buyers like you are primarily concerned about the real total implementation cost (TCO), full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, pros and cons. In this article we compare between the 2 software products:

How COMPAS Technology compares with HotSchedules?

COMPAS Technology: COMPAS Technology, founded in 2008, develops industry leading cloud based recruiting and talent management software solutions for both the corporate and staffing industries. We are committed to helping professionals within the talent acquisition and management industry recruit and on-board top talent effectively and efficiently. Our intuitive and ...

HotSchedules: Our Co-Founders, Ray Pawlikowski and David Cantu came up with the idea for HotSchedules while working at PF Chang’s together. Ray was the bartender and David was the manager. When a college project had Ray building a web site, he decided to use it to address one of the restaurant’s primary pain points – communicating the employee schedule. Manager...

Who's more expensive? COMPAS for Staffing or GoHire?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Recruitment software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance & support and other related services. When calculating the TCO it's important to add all of these "hidden cost" as well. We prepared a TCO calculator for COMPAS for Staffing and GoHire.

COMPAS for Staffing price starts at $39 per user/month , on a scale between 1 to 10 COMPAS for Staffing is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Recruitment software. GoHire price starts at $60 per month , when comparing GoHire to their competitors, the software is rated 2 - much lower than the average Recruitment software cost.

Bottom line: COMPAS for Staffing cost is around the same cost of GoHire.

Which software includes more/better features?

As with any business software solutions, it’s important to consider the features & functionality. The tool should support the processes, workflows, reports and needs that matter to your team. To help you evaluate this, we've compared COMPAS for Staffing Vs. GoHire based on some of the most important and required Recruitment features. COMPAS for Staffing: this software is considered "feature-rich" with more than 10 important features, here is a partial list: Appraisal Performance, Benefits Administration, HR Management, Recruiting, Billing & Invoicing, Email Integration, Recruiting Management, Resume Database. GoHire: Appraisal Performance, Benefits Administration, HR Management, LMS, Performance Record.

Target customer size

Compas provides recruiting and talent management solutions for the Corporate and Staffing industries. GoHire is best for restaurants that are looking for an affordable recruiting solution to help them get better qualified applicants.

ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
ITQlick score ITQlick Score is a 1 to 100, the calculation is based on pricing, and functionality Vs. alternative solutions
Pricing score pricing Score is a 1 to 10 (10 is high cost), based on the TCO (cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
Functionality score
Software review
Compare
COMPAS
ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
Score
91/100
Pricing Pricing score ranges between 1 to 10 while 1 is low TCO and 10 is high TCO (TCO - total cost of ownership: cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
2/10
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
$39 per user/month
Functionality
29
Review
Compare
GoHire
ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
Score
89/100
Pricing Pricing score ranges between 1 to 10 while 1 is low TCO and 10 is high TCO (TCO - total cost of ownership: cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
2.2/10
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
$60 per month
Functionality
27
Review
BirdDog
ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
Score
96/100
Pricing Pricing score ranges between 1 to 10 while 1 is low TCO and 10 is high TCO (TCO - total cost of ownership: cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
5/10
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
Pricing not available
Functionality
36
Front
ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
Score
91/100
Pricing Pricing score ranges between 1 to 10 while 1 is low TCO and 10 is high TCO (TCO - total cost of ownership: cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
8/10
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
Pricing not available
Functionality
8
Review
ApplicantStack
ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
Score
91/100
Pricing Pricing score ranges between 1 to 10 while 1 is low TCO and 10 is high TCO (TCO - total cost of ownership: cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
2.8/10
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
$95 per month
Functionality
16
Author
Shlomi Lavi - admin

Shlomi Lavi

Website Linkedin Facebook Twitter

Shlomi holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information System Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 15 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant, and implementation expert for small, medium and large size (global) companies.