Shlomi Lavi /
Nov 22, 2022
We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - Copperegg or Visual Performance?
Visual Performance is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Copperegg, and Visual Performance is rated higher (62/100) than Copperegg (50/100). Copperegg offers users more features (7) than Visual Performance (3).
Looking for the right Application Monitoring solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
Copperegg Vs. Fluke Networks
Copperegg: CopperEgg next-generation cloud monitoring provides simple, smart, and fast insight into the performance, quality, and availability of websites, web applications, servers, and systems. Our SaaS-based server monitoring, website monitoring, and cloud analytics deliver immediate intelligence into critical cloud performance problems, correlated visibil...
Fluke Networks: Fluke Networks offers best of breed solutions that span network deployment, network performance management and troubleshooting, as well as security and performance monitoring. Fluke Networks solutions are trusted by:
Network professionals to help them deploy, manage and troubleshoot business critical networks
Agencies, Enterprises & Car...
Who is more expensive? Copperegg or Visual Performance Manager?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Application Monitoring software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Copperegg and Visual Performance Manager.
Copperegg price starts at $240 per user/month , On a scale between 1 to 10 Copperegg is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Application Monitoring software. Visual Performance Manager accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 Copperegg is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Application Monitoring software.
Bottom line: Copperegg cost is around the same cost of Visual Performance Manager.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared Copperegg Vs. Visual Performance based on some of the most important and required Application Monitoring features.
Copperegg: Capacity Monitoring, IT Asset Management, IT Cost Management, Service Management, Service Reporting, Service Request Management, Virus Management.
Visual Performance Manager: Data Import/Export, Basic Reports, Online Customer Support.
Target customer size
CopperEgg is best for freelancers, large enterprises, mid size business, non profits and small businesses. and Visual Performance Manager's target customer size include: Medium and large size businesses.