Compare Dixa and Asterisk - Jun 2022
Compare PricingWe publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - Dixa or Asterisk?
Asterisk is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Dixa, and Dixa is rated higher (83/100) than Asterisk (71/100). Dixa offers users more features (5) than Asterisk (0). There is a clear winner in this case and it is Dixa!
Looking for the right Telephony solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
Dixa Vs. Digium
Dixa: Create one unified customer experience on email, chat and phone and eliminate the chaos caused by using separate systems.
Digium: Digium®, Inc. provides Asterisk® software, telephony hardware and Switchvox business phone systems that deliver enterprise-class Unified Communications (UC) at an affordable price. Digium is the creator, primary developer and sponsor of the Asterisk project, the world’s most widely used open source communications software. Asterisk turns an ordinar...
Who is more expensive? Dixa or Asterisk?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Telephony software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Dixa and Asterisk.
Dixa price starts at $99 per feature/month , On a scale between 1 to 10 Dixa is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Telephony software. Asterisk price starts at $595 per license , When comparing Asterisk to its competitors, the software is rated 6 - similar to the average Telephony software cost.
Bottom line: Asterisk is more expensive than Dixa.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared Dixa Vs. Asterisk based on some of the most important and required Telephony features.
Dixa: Chat, Email alerts, Email integration, Call Center, VoIP.
Asterisk: We are still working to collect the list of features for Asterisk.
Target customer size
Dixa's typical customers include: Small, medium and large size businesses, and Asterisk's target customer size include: SMBs.
Asterisk
starts at $595 per license
Asterisk is a cloud-based business phone, call center and telephony solution designed for businesses of any size. Some of its core features include call features such as call parking, call monitoring, call rout...
Compare PricingCompare specifications
Dixa Specifications
ITQlick Score: | 83/100 |
---|---|
ITQlick Rating: |
|
Pricing: | 2/10 - low cost |
Category: | Telephony -> Dixa review |
Company: | Dixa |
Pricing: | starts at $99 per feature/month |
Typical customers: | Small, medium and large size businesses |
Platforms: | Cloud |
Links: | Dixa review, Dixa pricing, Dixa alternatives |
Asterisk Specifications
ITQlick Score: | 71/100 |
---|---|
ITQlick Rating: |
|
Pricing: | 6/10 - average cost |
Category: | Telephony -> Asterisk review |
Company: | Digium |
Pricing: | starts at $595 per license |
Typical customers: | SMBs |
Platforms: | Desktop, Mobile, Cloud |
Links: | Asterisk review, Asterisk pricing, Asterisk alternatives |
Compare features
Dixa: 5 Features
Asterisk: 0 Features
Auditor - Shlomi Lavi
Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.