Compare eClinicalWorks and Praxis EMR - Mar 2022

eClinicalWorks

ITQlick rating
(3.4/5)

starts at $449 per provider/month + 2.9% of practice collections

eClinicalWorks is a practice management solution for healthcare providers. The solution offers a number of features that include a patient engagement tool that allows patients to engage better with their own he...

Categories: Medical, Allergy EMR, Cardiology EMR, CCHIT Certified EMR / EHR.

Praxis EMR

ITQlick rating
(5/5)

starts at $259 per month

Praxis EMR software is a leading electronic health record solution designed for different healthcare practices. It offers a number of solutions that include template-free documentation that helps users practice...

Categories: Medical, Anesthesia EMR, Cardiology EMR, CCHIT Certified EMR / EHR, Cloud Based EMR.

Compare specifications

Compare features

eClinicalWorks: 8 Features

Appointment Management
Charting
E-Prescribing
E/M Coding
Handwriting Recognition
HIPAA Compliant
Patient portal
Voice Recognition

Praxis EMR: 10 Features

Basic Reports
Data Import/Export
Online Customer Support
Appointment Management
Charting
E-Prescribing
E/M Coding
Handwriting Recognition
HIPAA Compliant
Voice Recognition
Shlomi LaviShlomi Lavi / Mar 22, 2022

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - eClinicalWorks or Praxis EMR?

eClinicalWorks is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Praxis EMR, and eClinicalWorks is rated higher (97/100) than Praxis EMR (92/100). Praxis EMR offers users more features (10) than eClinicalWorks (8).

Looking for the right Medical solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

eClinicalWorks Vs. Infor-Med Medical Information Systems, Inc

eClinicalWorks: eClinicalWorks is a privately-held, leader in ambulatory clinical solutions. Its technology extends the use of electronic health records beyond practice walls and creates community-wide records. The company has an established customer base of more than 80,000 physicians and 472,000 plus medical professionals across all 50 states with revenues for 2...

Infor-Med Medical Information Systems, Inc: Our twofold mission at Infor*Med Corporation is to make a profound contribution to the practice of medicine while creating an outstanding professional environment for our employees, industry representatives, and Praxis EMR clients. To accomplish our mission, we continually listen to our physician clients, to develop an EMR based exclusively on t...

Who is more expensive? eClinicalWorks or Praxis EMR?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Medical software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for eClinicalWorks and Praxis EMR.

eClinicalWorks price starts at $449 per provider/month + 2.9% of practice collections , On a scale between 1 to 10 eClinicalWorks is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Medical software. Praxis EMR price starts at $259 per month , When comparing Praxis EMR to its competitors, the software is rated 2 - much lower than the average Medical software cost.

Bottom line: eClinicalWorks is more expensive than Praxis EMR.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared eClinicalWorks Vs. Praxis EMR based on some of the most important and required Medical features.

eClinicalWorks: Appointment Management, Charting, E-Prescribing, E/M Coding, Handwriting Recognition, HIPAA Compliant, Patient portal, Voice Recognition.

Praxis EMR: Basic Reports, Data Import/Export, Online Customer Support, Appointment Management, Charting.

Target customer size

eClinicalWorks is suitable for physician practices, ACOs, out-patient departments of hospitals, clinics and health centers of various shapes and sizes. Praxis EMR is designed to work with any specialties of medicine in the healthcare industry and is focused on small and mid-sized clinics.

ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
ITQlick score ITQlick Score is a 1 to 100, the calculation is based on pricing, and functionality Vs. alternative solutions
Pricing score pricing Score is a 1 to 10 (10 is high cost), based on the TCO (cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
Functionality score
Software review
Compare
eClinicalWorks
ITQlick rating
3.4/5
Score
97/100
Pricing
5.2/10
License pricing
$449 per provider/month + 2.9% of practice collections
Functionality
41
Compare
Praxis E...
ITQlick rating
5/5
Score
92/100
Pricing
2/10
License pricing
$259 per month
Functionality
34
NextGen ...
ITQlick rating
4.5/5
Score
99/100
Pricing
2/10
License pricing
$299 per provider/month
Functionality
20
Practice...
ITQlick rating
4.5/5
Score
99/100
Pricing
2.6/10
License pricing
$149 per provider/month
Functionality
41
WebPT
ITQlick rating
4.4/5
Score
98/100
Pricing
4/10
License pricing
$3 per provider/day
Functionality
30
Review

Author - Shlomi Lavi

Website Linkedin profile Facebook Twitter

Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.