Compare Entronix and Practice fusion - Feb 2023

Shlomi Lavi

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - Entronix or Practice fusion?

Entronix is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Practice fusion, and Practice fusion is rated higher (99/100) than Entronix (74/100). Practice fusion offers users more features (12) than Entronix (0). There is a clear winner in this case and it is Practice fusion!

Looking for the right Facilities Management solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

Entronix Vs. practice fusion

Entronix: Entronix Energy Management Platform offers a sophisticated, powerful, and multi faceted product which is simple to deploy and can be run independent from, along-side, or on top of an existing building automation system.

practice fusion: Our implementation specialists are here to give you as much personal guidance as your practice needs to successfully start using your new EHR.

Who is more expensive? Entronix EMP or Practice fusion?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Facilities Management software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Entronix EMP and Practice fusion.

Entronix EMP price starts at $100 per feature , On a scale between 1 to 10 Entronix EMP is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Facilities Management software. Practice fusion price starts at $149 per provider/month , When comparing Practice fusion to its competitors, the software is rated 2 - much lower than the average Facilities Management software cost.

Bottom line: Entronix EMP is more expensive than Practice fusion.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared Entronix Vs. Practice fusion based on some of the most important and required Facilities Management features.

Entronix EMP: We are still working to collect the list of features for Entronix EMP.

Practice fusion: Basic Reports, Data Import/Export, Online Customer Support, Appointment Management, Charting.

Target customer size

Entronix EMP's typical customers include: Small, medium and large size businesses,

Practice Fusion Medical Software serves a wide range of healthcare providers, including primary care physicians, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and specialists such as dermatologists, psychiatrists, and oncologists.