Compare Epic and InterSystems - May 2023

Shlomi LaviShlomi Lavi / May 15, 2023

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - Epic or InterSystems?

InterSystems is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Epic, and InterSystems is rated with the same score (82/100) as Epic (82/100). InterSystems offers users more features (4) than Epic (2). There is a clear winner in this case and it is InterSystems!

Looking for the right Electronic Health Records (EHR) solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

Epic Systems Corporation Vs. InterSystems

Epic Systems Corporation: Epic Systems Corporation is a renowned healthcare software company based in Verona, Wisconsin. With a focus on electronic health record (EHR) systems, Epic provides comprehensive solutions for medical institutions worldwide. Its user-friendly interface, interoperability, and extensive functionality enhance patient care, data management, and operati...

InterSystems: Hear from thought leaders and customers around the world to help you make better sense of your data and inspire you to achieve more.

Who is more expensive? Epic or InterSystems HealthShare?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Electronic Health Records (EHR) software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Epic and InterSystems HealthShare.

Epic accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 Epic is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Electronic Health Records (EHR) software. InterSystems HealthShare accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 Epic is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Electronic Health Records (EHR) software.

Bottom line: Epic cost is around the same cost of InterSystems HealthShare.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared Epic Vs. InterSystems based on some of the most important and required Electronic Health Records (EHR) features.

Epic: Billing & Invoicing, Medical.

InterSystems HealthShare: Customizable Reporting, Mobile Access, Compliance , Medical.

Target customer size

Epic EHR software caters to a diverse range of customers across various industries within the healthcare sector. and InterSystems HealthShare's target customer size include: Small, medium and large size businesses.

Epic

ITQlick rating
(4.2/5)

Epic EHR software is a leading electronic health record system designed by Epic Systems Corporation. It offers a comprehensive suite of features and functionalities to streamline healthcare operations, improve ...

Categories: Reporting, Voice Recognition, Clinical Communications, Community Health Systems EHR.

InterSystems HealthShare

ITQlick rating
(4/5)

InterSystems technology and solutions power intelligent clinical workflows and real-time decision support wherever care decisions are made. They provide the analytics to manage an organization – or the health o...

Categories: CM Reporting & Analytics, Field Service Mobile Apps, Compliance , Mac EMR and Medical Billing, Patient Portal.

Compare specifications

Compare features

Epic: 2 Features

Billing & Invoicing
Medical

InterSystems HealthShare: 4 Features

Customizable Reporting
Mobile Access
Compliance
Medical
ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
ITQlick score ITQlick Score is a 1 to 100, the calculation is based on pricing, and functionality Vs. alternative solutions
Pricing score pricing Score is a 1 to 10 (10 is high cost), based on the TCO (cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
Functionality score
Software review
Compare
Epic
ITQlick rating
4.2/5
Score
82/100
Pricing
4/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
12
Review
Compare
InterSystems
ITQlick rating
4/5
Score
82/100
Pricing
4/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
13
GE
ITQlick rating
4/5
Score
82/100
Pricing
4/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
16
Review
Compare
SRSPro
ITQlick rating
4/5
Score
82/100
Pricing
4/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
6
Review
UroChart
ITQlick rating
4/5
Score
82/100
Pricing
4/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
7

Auditor - Shlomi Lavi

Website Linkedin profile Facebook Twitter

Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.