Compare eTapestry and Qgiv - Apr 2022

Shlomi Lavi

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - eTapestry or Qgiv?

eTapestry is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Qgiv, and eTapestry is rated higher (91/100) than Qgiv (85/100). eTapestry offers users more features (5) than Qgiv (0).

Looking for the right Non-Profit solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

Blackbaud Vs. Qgiv

Blackbaud: Serving the nonprofit and education sectors for 30 years, Blackbaud (NASDAQ: BLKB) combines technology and expertise to help organizations achieve their missions. Blackbaud works with more than 27,000 customers in over 60 countries that support higher education, healthcare, human services, arts and culture, faith, the environment, independent K-12 ...

Qgiv: Qgiv is working to make accepting online, mobile and in-person donations easier for nonprofit, faith-based and political organizations. We're passionate about connecting your organization with the next generation of donors.

Who is more expensive? eTapestry or Qgiv?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Non-Profit software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for eTapestry and Qgiv.

eTapestry price starts at $99 per month , On a scale between 1 to 10 eTapestry is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Non-Profit software. Qgiv price starts at $25 per month , When comparing Qgiv to its competitors, the software is rated 2 - much lower than the average Non-Profit software cost.

Bottom line: eTapestry is more expensive than Qgiv.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared eTapestry Vs. Qgiv based on some of the most important and required Non-Profit features.

eTapestry: Campaign Management, Contact Management, Email Marketing, Social Media, Email.

Qgiv: We are still working to collect the list of features for Qgiv.

Target customer size

Customers of the software include businesses of all sizes and types. Customers of the software include businesses of all sizes and types.