Compare Big Sky Facility Management and FAMIS - Sep 2022

Shlomi Lavi

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - Big Sky Facility Management or FAMIS?

FAMIS is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Big Sky Facility Management, and Big Sky Facility Management is rated higher (85/100) than FAMIS (80/100). FAMIS offers users more features (5) than Big Sky Facility Management (3).

Looking for the right Facilities Management solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

Big Sky Technologies Vs. Accruent

Big Sky Technologies: Big Sky Technologies, Inc. is a privately held California Corporation providing hosted application software solutions for customers throughout the United States and Canada. Big Sky specializes in communication centric solutions that leverage the skills of experienced software development, hosting and services teams. Big Sky has demonstrated steady ...

Accruent: Accruent provides software solutions to more than 1,000 customers covering the end-to-end real estate and facilities management lifecycle.The Accruent product automates the entire lifecycle of real estate activities to provide you with the clarity and visibility to maximize the performance of your locations. Accruent helps you right-size your portf...

Who is more expensive? Big Sky Facility Management or FAMIS?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Facilities Management software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Big Sky Facility Management and FAMIS.

Big Sky Facility Management accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 Facility Management is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Facilities Management software. FAMIS accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 Facility Management is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Facilities Management software.

Bottom line: FAMIS is more expensive than Big Sky Facility Management.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared Big Sky Facility Management Vs. FAMIS based on some of the most important and required Facilities Management features.

Big Sky Facility Management: Data Import/Export, Basic Reports, Online Customer Support.

FAMIS: Issue Tracking, Project Management, Maintenance Overview, Online Leasing, Space Planning.

Target customer size

Big Sky Facility Management is suitable for restaurant and retail chains. FAMIS was developing specifically with corporate, public and higher education institutions in mind.