Compare Fama/GAP and SMS Assist - Mar 2022

Shlomi LaviShlomi Lavi / Mar 11, 2022

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - Fama/GAP or SMS Assist?

SMS Assist is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Fama/GAP, and SMS Assist is rated higher (90/100) than Fama/GAP (50/100). Fama/GAP offers users more features (3) than SMS Assist (0).

Looking for the right Facilities Management solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

Fama Systems Facility Management Vs. SMS Assist, L.L.C.

Fama Systems Facility Management: Fama Systems is a solid and increasing structure of professionals who specialise in each part of the process and with extensive experience in the sector, turning every Fama Systems project into a coordinated and effective. Our mission is to help our customers through the aproppropiate technological tool, to convert the management of their propert...

SMS Assist, L.L.C.: SMS Assist provides a fully managed business solution to more than 110,000 client locations with a network of over 20,000 affiliate subcontractors. Using its unique business model and proprietary cloud-based technology platform, SMS Assist continuously reduces client costs to maintain their properties, while improving service quality and speed of d...

Who is more expensive? Fama/GAP or SMS Assist?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Facilities Management software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Fama/GAP and SMS Assist.

Fama/GAP accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 Fama/GAP is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Facilities Management software. SMS Assist accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 Fama/GAP is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Facilities Management software.

Bottom line: SMS Assist is more expensive than Fama/GAP.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared Fama/GAP Vs. SMS Assist based on some of the most important and required Facilities Management features.

Fama/GAP: Data Import/Export, Basic Reports, Online Customer Support.

SMS Assist: We are still working to collect the list of features for SMS Assist.

Target customer size

Customers of the software include businesses of all sizes and types. and SMS Assist's target customer size include: Small, medium and large size businesses.

Fama/GAP

ITQlick rating
(5/5)

Fama-GAP is a facility management solution for businesses of all sizes. It offers the services of inventory management, document management, financial management, property management, and others. The sof...

Categories: Operations.

SMS Assist

ITQlick rating
(3.1/5)

SMS Assist is a facilities management solution for small to large commercial and residential companies. It offers risk mitigation, data and analytics, SMS assist affiliates, route optimization, equipment and su...

Categories: Facilities Management.

Compare specifications

Compare features

Fama/GAP: 3 Features

Data Import/Export
Basic Reports
Online Customer Support

SMS Assist: 0 Features

We are working to collect the information
ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
ITQlick score ITQlick Score is a 1 to 100, the calculation is based on pricing, and functionality Vs. alternative solutions
Pricing score pricing Score is a 1 to 10 (10 is high cost), based on the TCO (cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
Functionality score
Software review
Compare
Fama/GAP
ITQlick rating
5/5
Score
50/100
Pricing
5.4/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
4
Compare
SMS Assi...
ITQlick rating
3.1/5
Score
90/100
Pricing
6/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
3
eMaint X...
ITQlick rating
4.5/5
Score
97/100
Pricing
2.2/10
License pricing
$33 per user/month
Functionality
34
HippoFM
ITQlick rating
4.4/5
Score
89/100
Pricing
5.8/10
License pricing
$35 per user/month
Functionality
29
icloudfi...
ITQlick rating
4.2/5
Score
89/100
Pricing
5.4/10
License pricing
$30 per user/month
Functionality
3

Auditor - Shlomi Lavi

Website Linkedin profile Facebook Twitter

Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.