Automate and align every concierge task from multiple departments into pre-defined sequences and details, while ensuring that all required SOP standards are followed.
Compare PricingWe publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
FCS is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Cloudbeds, and Cloudbeds is rated higher (93/100) than FCS (61/100).
Looking for the right Hotel Management solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
FCS Computer Systems: We enable hotels to deliver the best guest experience.
Cloudbeds: Running a hospitality business is a full-time job. Switching between your tools takes you away from your guests. With Cloudbeds, you have one log in, one system that is always in sync.
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Hotel Management software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for FCS Concierge Services Management and Cloudbeds.
FCS Concierge Services Management accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 FCS Concierge Services Management is rated 10, which is much higher than the average cost of Hotel Management software. Cloudbeds price starts at $75 per user/month , When comparing Cloudbeds to its competitors, the software is rated 2 - much lower than the average Hotel Management software cost.
Bottom line: FCS Concierge Services Management is more expensive than Cloudbeds.
We've compared FCS Vs. Cloudbeds based on some of the most important and required Hotel Management features.
FCS Concierge Services Management: We are still working to collect the list of features for FCS Concierge Services Management.
Cloudbeds: We are still working to collect the list of features for Cloudbeds.
FCS Concierge Services Management's typical customers include: Small, medium and large size businesses, and Cloudbeds's target customer size include: SMBs.
Automate and align every concierge task from multiple departments into pre-defined sequences and details, while ensuring that all required SOP standards are followed.
Compare PricingITQlick Score: | 61/100 |
---|---|
ITQlick Rating: |
|
Pricing: | 10/10 - high cost |
Category: | Hotel Management -> FCS Concierge Services Management review |
Company: | FCS Computer Systems |
Typical customers: | Small, medium and large size businesses |
Platforms: | Cloud |
Links: | FCS Concierge Services Management review, FCS Concierge Services Management pricing, FCS Concierge Services Management alternatives |
ITQlick Score: | 93/100 |
---|---|
ITQlick Rating: |
|
Pricing: | 2/10 - low cost |
Category: | Hotel Management -> Cloudbeds review |
Company: | Cloudbeds |
Pricing: | starts at $75 per user/month |
Typical customers: | SMBs |
Platforms: | Cloud |
Links: | Cloudbeds review, Cloudbeds pricing, Cloudbeds alternatives |
Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.