Shlomi Lavi /
Jul 05, 2022
We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - FinancialForce PSA or time@work?
FinancialForce PSA is more expensive to implement (TCO) than time@work, and time@work is rated higher (83/100) than FinancialForce PSA (82/100). FinancialForce PSA offers users more features (10) than time@work (5).
Looking for the right Professional Services Automation solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
Financial Force Vs. systems@work
Financial Force: FinancialForce.com is the cloud applications company. We focus 100% on building business applications for Force.com, the world’s leading cloud computing platform from salesforce.com. Our applications include Accounting, Billing, Professional Services Automation (PSA) and Services Resource Planning (SRP). We serve fast-growing organizations as well...
systems@work: systems@work is a leading provider of Expense Management, Time Recording and Professional Services Automation solutions.
systems@work staff are amongst the most experienced and highly skilled consultants in their field and we engage with organisations around the world to ensure that projects are implemented on time and within budget.
systems@...
Who is more expensive? FinancialForce PSA or time@work?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Professional Services Automation software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for FinancialForce PSA and time@work.
FinancialForce PSA price starts at $10 per month , On a scale between 1 to 10 FinancialForce PSA is rated 8, which is higher than the average cost of Professional Services Automation software. time@work price starts at $20,000 per license , When comparing time@work to its competitors, the software is rated 6 - similar to the average Professional Services Automation software cost.
Bottom line: FinancialForce PSA is more expensive than time@work.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared FinancialForce PSA Vs. time@work based on some of the most important and required Professional Services Automation features.
FinancialForce PSA: Budget & Expense Management, Collaboration, Issue Tracking, Project Management, Resource Management, Scheduling, Task Management, Client Collaboration.
time@work: Dashboard, Employee Onboarding, Project Billing, Billing & Invoicing, Time Tracking.
Target customer size
This solution is aimed at companies that have a large number of professionals to manage, businesses that need to automate their entire process of interacting with customers and to manage their financial resources. Customers of the software include businesses of all sizes and a wide range of types.