Shlomi Lavi /
Aug 18, 2022
We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - Fixed Asset Tracking or Maintenance Connection?
Maintenance Connection is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Fixed Asset Tracking, and Maintenance Connection is rated higher (86/100) than Fixed Asset Tracking (71/100). Maintenance Connection offers users more features (20) than Fixed Asset Tracking (3).
Looking for the right Fixed Asset Accounting solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
RedBeam Vs. Maintenance Connection, Inc.
RedBeam: RedBeam, Inc. is a leading provider of complete barcode-based software solutions with one objective – to make it as easy as possible for you to do business with RedBeam. With decades of experience in barcode technology, the designers of the RedBeam product line have a product offering that is intuitive, affordable, and complete.
Intuitive – With o...
Maintenance Connection, Inc.: The Maintenance Connection solution encompasses the entire maintenance spectrum helping maintenance and facility managers across the globe increase asset life, predict and prevent asset failures, improve labor productivity, reduce costly downtimes, minimize investments in inventory, and lower the total cost of maintenance. The Maintenance Connectio...
Who is more expensive? Fixed Asset Tracking or Maintenance Connection?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Fixed Asset Accounting software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Fixed Asset Tracking and Maintenance Connection.
Fixed Asset Tracking price starts at $995 per user/year , On a scale between 1 to 10 Fixed Asset Tracking Software is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Fixed Asset Accounting software. Maintenance Connection price starts at $199 per month , When comparing Maintenance Connection to its competitors, the software is rated 6 - similar to the average Fixed Asset Accounting software cost.
Bottom line: Maintenance Connection is more expensive than Fixed Asset Tracking.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared Fixed Asset Tracking Vs. Maintenance Connection based on some of the most important and required Fixed Asset Accounting features.
Fixed Asset Tracking: Data Import/Export, Basic Reports, Online Customer Support.
Maintenance Connection: Maintenance Overview, Online Rental Applications, Proactive System Notifications, Asset Management, Barcode Scanning.
Target customer size
Fixed Asset Tracking's typical customers include: Small, medium and large size businesses, Maintenance Connection is best for small to mid-sized businesses, supporting anywhere from 10 users to 10,000 users in sectors such as general facilities management, travel agencies, healthcare, energy development, manufacturing, warehouses, utilities, and government sectors.