starts at $25 per user/month
GoSpotCheck is a field service software designed to enable businesses to run marketing campaigns, thereby making more profits from the field.
Compare PricingWe publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
GoSpotCheck is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Workiz, and Workiz is rated higher (96/100) than GoSpotCheck (89/100).
Looking for the right Field Service solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
GoSpotCheck: GoSpotCheck has created a simple, uniform way to collect, structure, and share retail intelligence. Through our mobile app, teams can streamline field data collection and make better decisions. GoSpotCheck's web and mobile apps automate the structuring and reporting of field data, enabling companies to make better decisions faster. Say goodbye to i...
Workiz: Workiz helps thousands of field service professionals run more profitable, five star operations.
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Field Service software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for GoSpotCheck and Workiz.
GoSpotCheck price starts at $25 per user/month , On a scale between 1 to 10 GoSpotCheck Software is rated 6, which is similar to the average cost of Field Service software. Workiz price starts at $65 per month , When comparing Workiz to its competitors, the software is rated 2 - much lower than the average Field Service software cost.
Bottom line: GoSpotCheck is more expensive than Workiz.
We've compared GoSpotCheck Vs. Workiz based on some of the most important and required Field Service features.
GoSpotCheck: We are still working to collect the list of features for GoSpotCheck.
Workiz: We are still working to collect the list of features for Workiz.
GoSpotCheck's typical customers include: Small, medium and large size businesses, and Workiz's target customer size include: Small, medium and large size businesses.
starts at $25 per user/month
GoSpotCheck is a field service software designed to enable businesses to run marketing campaigns, thereby making more profits from the field.
Compare Pricingstarts at $65 per month
Workiz is a cloud-enabled Field Service software that allows managers to receive payments from track and/or field invoices, as well as handling field service dispatch.
Compare PricingITQlick Score: | 89/100 |
---|---|
ITQlick Rating: |
|
Pricing: | 6/10 - average cost |
Category: | Field Service -> GoSpotCheck review |
Company: | GoSpotCheck |
Pricing: | starts at $25 per user/month |
Typical customers: | Small, medium and large size businesses |
Platforms: | Desktop, Mobile, Cloud |
Links: | GoSpotCheck review, GoSpotCheck pricing, GoSpotCheck alternatives |
ITQlick Score: | 96/100 |
---|---|
ITQlick Rating: |
|
Pricing: | 2/10 - low cost |
Category: | Field Service -> Workiz review |
Company: | Workiz |
Pricing: | starts at $65 per month |
Typical customers: | Small, medium and large size businesses |
Platforms: | Cloud |
Links: | Workiz review, Workiz pricing, Workiz alternatives |
Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.