Greenhouse Vs Avature ATS

Shlomi LaviShlomi Lavi / May 01, 2021

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. Learn more by reading our advertiser disclosure.

Bottom Line: Which is Better - Greenhouse or Avature ATS?

Greenhouse is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Avature ATS, Greenhouse is rated higher (99/100) than Avature ATS (92/100). Greenhouse offers more features (5) to their users than Avature ATS (4).

Looking for the right Applicant Tracking solution for your business? buyers like you are primarily concerned about the real total implementation cost (TCO), full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, pros and cons. In this article we compare between the 2 software products:

How Greenhouse Software compares with Avature?

Greenhouse Software: Greenhouse is the only recruiting software designed by people who actually understand recruiting - built specifically for companies who know how important it is to hire great people. Being good at hiring isn’t a secret—hundreds of books, newsletters, and articles explain the same best practices over and over again. The thing is, it’s tough to pu...

Avature: Avature is a highly flexible enterprise SaaS platform for Global Talent Acquisition and Talent Management, and the leading global provider of CRM for recruiting. Founded by Dimitri Boylan, co-founder and former CEO of HotJobs.com, Avature brings commercial internet technology and innovation to recruiting, internal mobility, and performance challeng...

Who's more expensive? Greenhouse or Avature ATS?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Applicant Tracking software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance & support and other related services. When calculating the TCO it's important to add all of these "hidden cost" as well. We prepared a TCO calculator for Greenhouse and Avature ATS.

Greenhouse price starts at $6,000 per year , on a scale between 1 to 10 Greenhouse is rated 6, which is similar to the average cost of Applicant Tracking software. Avature ATS price Has a free version , when comparing Avature ATS to their competitors, the software is rated 2 - much lower than the average Applicant Tracking software cost.

Bottom line: Greenhouse is more expensive than Avature ATS.

Which software includes more/better features?

As with any business software solutions, it’s important to consider the features & functionality. The tool should support the processes, workflows, reports and needs that matter to your team. To help you evaluate this, we've compared Greenhouse Vs. Avature ATS based on some of the most important and required Applicant Tracking features. Greenhouse: Workflow, Recruiting, Reference Checking, Applicant Tracking, CRM. Avature ATS: Workflow, Applicant Tracking, Resume Database, Configurable Workflow.

Target customer size

The software program is a sensible item for organizations of all dimensions. Customers of the software include thousands of small and big companies all over the world.

Greenhouse

ITQlick rating
(4.5/5)

starts at $6,000 per year

Greenhouse is a recruitment optimization and applicant tracking solution for small and medium businesses. Its capabilities include candidate management, interview management, social media integration, a...

Categories: CRM, Self-Service Portal, Applicant Tracking, Employee Management.

Avature ATS

ITQlick rating
(4.6/5)

Has a free version

Avature ATS enables global organizations to go beyond the constraints of legacy ATS by combining modern web technology with powerful customization and advanced analytics to make strategic HR possible.

Categories: Applicant Tracking, Employee Recognition, Recruitment, HR Department, Workforce Management.

Compare specifications

Compare features

Greenhouse: 5 Features

Workflow
Recruiting
Reference Checking
Applicant Tracking
CRM

Avature ATS: 4 Features

Workflow
Applicant Tracking
Resume Database
Configurable Workflow
ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
ITQlick score ITQlick Score is a 1 to 100, the calculation is based on pricing, and functionality Vs. alternative solutions
Pricing score pricing Score is a 1 to 10 (10 is high cost), based on the TCO (cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
Functionality score
Software review
Compare
Greenhouse
ITQlick rating
4.5/5
Score
99/100
Pricing
6.2/10
License pricing
$6,000 per year
Functionality
17
Compare
Avature
ITQlick rating
4.6/5
Score
92/100
Pricing
3.2/10
License pricing
Has a free version
Functionality
11
HRM
ITQlick rating
4.3/5
Score
99/100
Pricing
2.6/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
15
Review
Collage
ITQlick rating
4.1/5
Score
97/100
Pricing
2.6/10
License pricing
$7 per user/month
Functionality
22
Bullhorn
ITQlick rating
4.1/5
Score
97/100
Pricing
2.2/10
License pricing
$99 per user/month
Functionality
18
Author

Shlomi Lavi

Website Linkedin Facebook Twitter

Shlomi holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information System Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 15 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant, and implementation expert for small, medium and large size (global) companies.