HealthLink Vs HARP (Aug 2020)
Shlomi Lavi / Aug 29, 2020
We publish unbiased reviews, our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. Learn more in our advertiser disclosure.
HARP
HARP (Health Accounts Receivable Processor) is a cloud-hosted and on-premise medical billing platform that is built to support small and medium-sized medical practices. The software is tailored to handle the bi...
Compare PricingCompare specifications
HealthLink Specifications
ITQlick Score: | 83/100 |
---|---|
ITQlick Rating: | (4.5/5) |
Pricing: | 2/10 - low cost |
Category: | Medical Billing -> HealthLink |
Company: | HealthLink |
Pricing: | starts at $345 per year |
Typical customers: | SMBs |
Platforms: | Desktop, Mobile, Cloud |
Links: | HealthLink review, HealthLink pricing, HealthLink alternatives |
HARP Specifications
ITQlick Score: | 92/100 |
---|---|
ITQlick Rating: | (5/5) |
Pricing: | 4/10 - average cost |
Category: | Medical Billing -> HARP |
Company: | Quadax |
Typical customers: | SMBs |
Platforms: | Desktop, Cloud |
Links: | HARP review, HARP pricing, HARP alternatives |
Compare features
HealthLink: 4 Features
HARP: 0 Features
Bottom Line: Which is Better - HealthLink or HARP?
HARP is more expensive to implement (TCO - Total Cost of Ownership) than HealthLink, HARP is rated higher (92/100) than HealthLink (83/100). HealthLink offers more features (4) to their users than HARP (0).
Looking for the right Medical Billing solution for your business? buyers like you are primarily concerned about the real total implementation cost (TCO), full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, pros and cons. In this article we compare between the 2 software products:
How HealthLink compares with Quadax?
HealthLink: HealthLink is unique business model is rapidly altering the healthcare solutions landscape. You no more buy software - just adopt HealthLink cloud-based solutions instead. HealthLink is much more than conventional software - an unparalleled service acceleration and collaboration tool, that harnesses the power of internet to drive your success.
Quadax: From the very beginning, Quadax has embraced innovation. The quest for new technologies, process improvements, and superior customer service has been a driving force since our founding in 1973. Although the healthcare billing industry has undergone staggering changes over the last forty years, Quadax has continued to thrive because we understand wh...
Who's more expensive? HealthLink or HARP?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Medical Billing software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance & support and other related services. When calculating the TCO it's important to add all of these "hidden cost" as well. We prepared a TCO calculator for HealthLink and HARP.
HealthLink price starts at $345 per year , on a scale between 1 to 10 HealthLink is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Medical Billing software. HARP accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , on a scale between 1 to 10 HealthLink is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Medical Billing software.
Bottom line:HARP is more expensive than HealthLink.
Which software includes more/better features?
As with any business software solutions, it’s important to consider the features & functionality. The tool should support the processes, workflows, reports and needs that matter to your team. To help you evaluate this, we've compared HealthLink Vs. HARP based on some of the most important and required Medical Billing features. HealthLink: E-Prescribing, Patient portal, Medical, Medical. HARP: We are still working to collect the list of features for HARP.
Target customer size
HealthLink's typical customers include: SMBs, and HARP's target customer size include: SMBs.
Author

Shlomi Lavi
Shlomi holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information System Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 15 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant, and implementation expert for small, medium and large size (global) companies.