Shlomi Lavi /
Oct 04, 2022
We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - HippoFM or MACH?
HippoFM is more expensive to implement (TCO) than MACH, and HippoFM is rated higher (89/100) than MACH (80/100). HippoFM offers users more features (23) than MACH (0).
Looking for the right Facilities Management solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
Hippo Facilities Management Vs. MACH Energy
Hippo Facilities Management: HippoFM has been providing affordable, user friendly innovative CMMS (Computerized Maintenance Management Software) solutions since 2002. We were one of the first CMMS providers to develop a completely customizable user interface which can be tailored to meet any maintenance operation’s needs.
Our growing client-base consists of over 500 sites ...
MACH Energy: MACH Energy is modern energy management software for commercial buildings. Our intuitive and mobile analytics and powerful reporting tools make your job easier and increase building value.
Who is more expensive? HippoFM or MACH Energy?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Facilities Management software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for HippoFM and MACH Energy.
HippoFM price starts at $35 per user/month , On a scale between 1 to 10 HippoFM is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Facilities Management software. MACH Energy accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 HippoFM is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Facilities Management software.
Bottom line: HippoFM is more expensive than MACH Energy.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared HippoFM Vs. MACH based on some of the most important and required Facilities Management features.
HippoFM: this software is considered "feature-rich" with more than 10 important features, here is a partial list: Automatic Data Backup, Automatic Property Mapping, Easy Data Migration, Email Owner Statements, Excel Export, File Storage, Maintenance Overview, Online Rental Applications.
MACH Energy: We are still working to collect the list of features for MACH Energy.
Target customer size
HippoFM is a good business solution for businesses of all sizes. and MACH Energy's target customer size include: Small, medium and large size businesses.