Shlomi Lavi / Mar 11, 2022We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Inforouter is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Box, and Box is rated higher (92/100) than Inforouter (76/100). Box offers users more features (8) than Inforouter (3). There is a clear winner in this case and it is Box!
Looking for the right Document Management solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
Active Innovations inc: Active Innovations, Inc. provides enterprise content and document management solutions to a vast array of companies in different lines of businesses. The infoRouter platform enables people to collaboratively create, manage, deliver, and archive the content that is the lifeblood of every business. Our vision is to create the ultimate content a...
Box.net: Box.net is the maker of Box software that lets you store all of your content online, so you can access, manage and share it from anywhere. Integrate Box with Google Apps and Salesforce and access Box on mobile devices
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Document Management software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Inforouter and Box.
Inforouter price starts at $4,750 per license , On a scale between 1 to 10 Inforouter is rated 6, which is similar to the average cost of Document Management software. Box price starts at $15 per user/month , When comparing Box to its competitors, the software is rated 2 - much lower than the average Document Management software cost.
Bottom line: Inforouter is more expensive than Box.
We've compared Inforouter Vs. Box based on some of the most important and required Document Management features.
Inforouter: Data Import/Export, Basic Reports, Online Customer Support.
Box: Basic Reports, Data Import/Export, Online Customer Support, Version Control, Document Indexing.
Customers of the software include small and medium businesses as well as large enterprises. Customers of the software include small and medium businesses as well as large enterprises.
starts at $4,750 per license
InfoRouter is a document management solution for businesses of all sizes. Its capabilities include ISO document control, storage and distribution, compliance management, and others. The software was des...
Compare Pricing| ITQlick Score: | 76/100 |
|---|---|
| ITQlick Rating: |
|
| Pricing: | 6/10 - average cost |
| Category: | Document Management -> Inforouter review |
| Company: | Active Innovations inc |
| Pricing: | starts at $4,750 per license |
| Typical customers: | Small businesses and start ups |
| Platforms: | Desktop, Cloud |
| Links: | Inforouter review, Inforouter pricing, Inforouter alternatives |
| ITQlick Score: | 92/100 |
|---|---|
| ITQlick Rating: |
|
| Pricing: | 2/10 - low cost |
| Category: | Document Management -> Box review |
| Company: | Box.net |
| Pricing: | starts at $15 per user/month |
| Typical customers: | Small, medium and large size businesses |
| Platforms: | Cloud |
| Links: | Box review, Box pricing, Box alternatives |
Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.