Compare InterSystems and Nimbo - May 2023

Shlomi LaviShlomi Lavi / May 23, 2023

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - InterSystems or Nimbo?

Nimbo is more expensive to implement (TCO) than InterSystems, and Nimbo is rated with the same score (82/100) as InterSystems (82/100). InterSystems offers users more features (4) than Nimbo (2). There is a clear winner in this case and it is InterSystems!

Looking for the right Electronic Health Records (EHR) solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

InterSystems Vs. eCareSoft

InterSystems: Hear from thought leaders and customers around the world to help you make better sense of your data and inspire you to achieve more.

eCareSoft: eCareSoft is a healthcare technology company providing innovative solutions for small to mid-sized hospitals and clinics. Their integrated EHR and PM platform offers features like patient management, clinical documentation, revenue cycle management, and analytics. eCareSoft focuses on delivering cost-effective and user-friendly solutions tailored t...

Who is more expensive? InterSystems HealthShare or Nimbo?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Electronic Health Records (EHR) software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for InterSystems HealthShare and Nimbo.

InterSystems HealthShare accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 InterSystems HealthShare is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Electronic Health Records (EHR) software. Nimbo accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 InterSystems HealthShare is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Electronic Health Records (EHR) software.

Bottom line: InterSystems HealthShare cost is around the same cost of Nimbo.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared InterSystems Vs. Nimbo based on some of the most important and required Electronic Health Records (EHR) features.

InterSystems HealthShare: Customizable Reporting, Mobile Access, Compliance , Medical.

Nimbo: Billing & Invoicing, Medical.

Target customer size

InterSystems HealthShare's typical customers include: Small, medium and large size businesses,

Nimbo EHR serves a diverse range of customers in the healthcare industry, catering to various healthcare providers and organizations.



InterSystems HealthShare

ITQlick rating
(4/5)

InterSystems technology and solutions power intelligent clinical workflows and real-time decision support wherever care decisions are made. They provide the analytics to manage an organization – or the health o...

Categories: CM Reporting & Analytics, Field Service Mobile Apps, Compliance , Mac EMR and Medical Billing.

Nimbo

ITQlick rating
(4.8/5)

NImbo EHR is a comprehensive electronic health record (EHR) system designed to streamline and enhance healthcare practices. It offers features such as patient management, medical charting, appointment schedulin...

Categories: CCHIT Certified EMR / EHR, E-Prescribing, Electronic Health Records (EHR), Electronic Prescribing, Medical Billing & Invoicing.

Compare specifications

Compare features

InterSystems HealthShare: 4 Features

Customizable Reporting
Mobile Access
Compliance
Medical

Nimbo: 2 Features

Billing & Invoicing
Medical
ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
ITQlick score ITQlick Score is a 1 to 100, the calculation is based on pricing, and functionality Vs. alternative solutions
Pricing score pricing Score is a 1 to 10 (10 is high cost), based on the TCO (cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
Functionality score
Software review
Compare
InterSystems
ITQlick rating
4/5
Score
82/100
Pricing
4/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
13
Compare
Nimbo
ITQlick rating
4.8/5
Score
82/100
Pricing
4/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
10
Review
GE
ITQlick rating
4/5
Score
82/100
Pricing
4/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
16
Review
SRSPro
ITQlick rating
4/5
Score
82/100
Pricing
4/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
6
Review
UroChart
ITQlick rating
4/5
Score
82/100
Pricing
4/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
7

Auditor - Shlomi Lavi

Website Linkedin profile Facebook Twitter

Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.