Shlomi Lavi /
Feb 27, 2023
We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - LAMS or CALF?
LAMS is more expensive to implement (TCO) than CALF, and LAMS is rated higher (92/100) than CALF (61/100).
Looking for the right LMS solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
LAMS Foundation Vs. NuVeda
LAMS Foundation: The LAMS Foundation is a not-for-profit organisation that manages research and development into LAMS and the concepts of Learning Design. The Foundation is based at Macquarie University, Australia as part of the Macquarie E-learning Centre Of Excellence (MELCOE), under the leadership of Professor James Dalziel (Director of MELCOE and inventor of L...
NuVeda: Dr. Balasubramanian Krishnan is the Chief Executive Officer at NuVeda Learning Pvt. Ltd. He is the key architect of the NuCLO™ learning platform that allows the impact measurement of learning interventions.
Prior to this role, he was the worldwide Six Sigma leader of EMC Corporation, a $10B multinational company with over 25000 employees. At E...
Who is more expensive? LAMS or CALF?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of LMS software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for LAMS and CALF.
LAMS price starts at $9,995 per year , On a scale between 1 to 10 LAMS is rated 6, which is similar to the average cost of LMS software. CALF price starts at $13 per user/month , When comparing CALF to its competitors, the software is rated 4 - lower than the average LMS software cost.
Bottom line: LAMS is more expensive than CALF.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared LAMS Vs. CALF based on some of the most important and required LMS features.
LAMS: We are still working to collect the list of features for LAMS.
CALF: We are still working to collect the list of features for CALF.
Target customer size
LAMS LMS software is used by a diverse range of customers, including K-12 and higher education institutions, corporate training departments, government agencies, and non-profit organizations. and CALF's target customer size include: Medium and large size businesses.