Compare Mule ESB and Okta Workflows - Dec 2022

Shlomi Lavi

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - Mule ESB or Okta Workflows?

Okta Workflows is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Mule ESB, and Mule ESB is rated higher (90/100) than Okta Workflows (84/100). Mule ESB offers users more features (5) than Okta Workflows (0). There is a clear winner in this case and it is Mule ESB!

Looking for the right Enterprise Integration solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

Mulesoft Vs. Azuqua

Mulesoft: MuleSoft provides the most widely used integration platform for connecting SaaS and enterprise applications in the cloud and on-premise With the rise of cloud and mobile, enterprises face a choice: become overwhelmed by the resulting explosion of end points or seize the opportunity to gain competitive advantage. Founded on the idea that connecti...

Azuqua: Just because business is more complex doesn't mean that integration should be. In fact at Azuqua, we believe data and process integration have to be simple for business to be agile, fast, and customer-centric. That's why we built the Azuqua platform. The Azuqua platform eliminates coding with unique no-code integration that is easily implemented by...

Who is more expensive? Mule ESB or Azuqua?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Enterprise Integration software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Mule ESB and Azuqua.

Mule ESB price starts at $80,000 per year , On a scale between 1 to 10 Mule ESB is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Enterprise Integration software. Azuqua price starts at $250 per user/month , When comparing Azuqua to its competitors, the software is rated 4 - lower than the average Enterprise Integration software cost.

Bottom line: Mule ESB cost is around the same cost of Azuqua.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared Mule ESB Vs. Okta Workflows based on some of the most important and required Enterprise Integration features.

Mule ESB: 24/7 Telephone Support, API, Mobile Access, Online Customer Support, Telephone Customer Support.

Azuqua: We are still working to collect the list of features for Azuqua.

Target customer size

Mule ESB is best for large enterprises as well as small to large businesses across several industries including retail, government, media and telecommunications, healthcare, and insurance. and Azuqua's target customer size include: SMBs.