Shlomi Lavi /
Aug 05, 2022
We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - Organizer for Outlook or Q-Flow Appointment?
Organizer for Outlook is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Q-Flow Appointment, and Q-Flow Appointment is rated higher (87/100) than Organizer for Outlook (81/100).
Looking for the right Professional Services Automation solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
Ceptara Vs. Q-Nomy
Ceptara: Established in 2002 and headquartered in the Greater Seattle Washington area, Ceptara® is a private, employee owned business focused on providing management consulting, coaching, training and tools to organizations and knowledge workers to help them achieve their goals effectively.
Q-Nomy: Since 2002, Q-nomy has been developing, selling, and implementing software solutions that help organizations optimize the customer experience in their branches or stores.
Q-nomy’s vision is to make the most of every customer visit: more sales, greater customer satisfaction, and a better overall experience.
Q-nomy’s software tailors the indi...
Who is more expensive? Organizer for Outlook or Q-Flow Appointment Management?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Professional Services Automation software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Organizer for Outlook and Q-Flow Appointment Management.
Organizer for Outlook price starts at $50 per license , On a scale between 1 to 10 Organizer for Outlook is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Professional Services Automation software. Q-Flow Appointment Management accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 Organizer for Outlook is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Professional Services Automation software.
Bottom line: Organizer for Outlook cost is around the same cost of Q-Flow Appointment Management.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared Organizer for Outlook Vs. Q-Flow Appointment based on some of the most important and required Professional Services Automation features.
Organizer for Outlook: We are still working to collect the list of features for Organizer for Outlook.
Q-Flow Appointment Management: We are still working to collect the list of features for Q-Flow Appointment Management.
Target customer size
Organizer for Outlook's typical customers include: Small, medium and large size businesses, and Q-Flow Appointment Management's target customer size include: Small, medium and large size businesses.