Shlomi Lavi /
Feb 17, 2023
We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - Practice fusion or Beacon Specialty EMR?
Beacon Specialty EMR is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Practice fusion, and Practice fusion is rated higher (99/100) than Beacon Specialty EMR (84/100). Practice fusion offers users more features (12) than Beacon Specialty EMR (2). There is a clear winner in this case and it is Practice fusion!
Looking for the right Medical solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
practice fusion Vs. Boston Advanced Analytics
practice fusion: Our implementation specialists are here to give you as much personal guidance as your practice needs to successfully start using your new EHR.
Boston Advanced Analytics : Boston Advanced Analytics specializes in advanced data analysis Top 10 Tips to Choose Your EMR software for the healthcare industry. We are dedicated to helping healthcare providers and researchers on all levels, including:
Aurora EMR & practice management to capture the data your EHR can’t collect
Clinical Data Registry to gain ...
Who is more expensive? Practice fusion or Beacon Specialty EMR (Aurora EMR)?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Medical software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Practice fusion and Beacon Specialty EMR (Aurora EMR).
Practice fusion price starts at $149 per provider/month , On a scale between 1 to 10 Practice fusion is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Medical software. Beacon Specialty EMR (Aurora EMR) accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 Practice fusion is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Medical software.
Bottom line: Beacon Specialty EMR (Aurora EMR) is more expensive than Practice fusion.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared Practice fusion Vs. Beacon Specialty EMR based on some of the most important and required Medical features.
Practice fusion: this software is considered "feature-rich" with more than 10 important features, here is a partial list: Basic Reports, Data Import/Export, Online Customer Support, Appointment Management, Charting, E-Prescribing, HIPAA Compliant, Medication history.
Beacon Specialty EMR (Aurora EMR): Compliance , Computer aided design.
Target customer size
Practice Fusion Medical Software serves a wide range of healthcare providers, including primary care physicians, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and specialists such as dermatologists, psychiatrists, and oncologists. The software is a useful solution for medical practices and businesses of all sizes and a diverse range of types.