Shlomi Lavi /
Feb 17, 2023
We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - Practice fusion or NeoMed EHR?
NeoMed EHR is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Practice fusion, and Practice fusion is rated higher (99/100) than NeoMed EHR (78/100). Practice fusion offers users more features (12) than NeoMed EHR (2). There is a clear winner in this case and it is Practice fusion!
Looking for the right Medical solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
practice fusion Vs. NeoDeck Holdings
practice fusion: Our implementation specialists are here to give you as much personal guidance as your practice needs to successfully start using your new EHR.
NeoDeck Holdings: NeoDeck Holdings Corp develops innovative software solutions for the Healthcare Industry.Current solutions include NeoMed EHR, CLinical Vault Health Information Exchange and PatientVault Patient Portal.
Who is more expensive? Practice fusion or NeoMed EHR?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Medical software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Practice fusion and NeoMed EHR.
Practice fusion price starts at $149 per provider/month , On a scale between 1 to 10 Practice fusion is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Medical software. NeoMed EHR accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 Practice fusion is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Medical software.
Bottom line: NeoMed EHR is more expensive than Practice fusion.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared Practice fusion Vs. NeoMed EHR based on some of the most important and required Medical features.
Practice fusion: this software is considered "feature-rich" with more than 10 important features, here is a partial list: Basic Reports, Data Import/Export, Online Customer Support, Appointment Management, Charting, E-Prescribing, HIPAA Compliant, Medication history.
NeoMed EHR: Charting, E-Prescribing.
Target customer size
Practice Fusion Medical Software serves a wide range of healthcare providers, including primary care physicians, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and specialists such as dermatologists, psychiatrists, and oncologists. Customers of the software include medical practices and businesses of all sizes and various types.