Shlomi Lavi /
Feb 17, 2023
We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - Practice fusion or Patagonia Health EHR?
Patagonia Health EHR is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Practice fusion, and Practice fusion is rated higher (99/100) than Patagonia Health EHR (75/100). Practice fusion offers users more features (12) than Patagonia Health EHR (6). There is a clear winner in this case and it is Practice fusion!
Looking for the right Medical solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
practice fusion Vs. Patagonia Health
practice fusion: Our implementation specialists are here to give you as much personal guidance as your practice needs to successfully start using your new EHR.
Patagonia Health: Patagonia Health Inc. is a healthcare software supplier that has built a cloud and apps-based software solution. The solution includes an integrated, seamless, Electronic Health Record (EHR), Practice Management (PM) and Billing software. The company’s mission is to solve two major barriers to EHR adoption – usability and cost – and address custome...
Who is more expensive? Practice fusion or Patagonia Health EHR?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Medical software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Practice fusion and Patagonia Health EHR.
Practice fusion price starts at $149 per provider/month , On a scale between 1 to 10 Practice fusion is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Medical software. Patagonia Health EHR accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 Practice fusion is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Medical software.
Bottom line: Practice fusion cost is around the same cost of Patagonia Health EHR.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared Practice fusion Vs. Patagonia Health EHR based on some of the most important and required Medical features.
Practice fusion: this software is considered "feature-rich" with more than 10 important features, here is a partial list: Basic Reports, Data Import/Export, Online Customer Support, Appointment Management, Charting, E-Prescribing, HIPAA Compliant, Medication history.
Patagonia Health EHR: Billing & Invoicing, EDI, E-Prescribing, HIPAA Compliant, Patient portal.
Target customer size
Practice Fusion Medical Software serves a wide range of healthcare providers, including primary care physicians, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and specialists such as dermatologists, psychiatrists, and oncologists. and Patagonia Health EHR's target customer size include: Small, medium and large size businesses.