Shlomi Lavi /
Feb 17, 2023
We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - Practice fusion or RadPix?
RadPix is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Practice fusion, and Practice fusion is rated higher (99/100) than RadPix (85/100). Practice fusion offers users more features (12) than RadPix (0). There is a clear winner in this case and it is Practice fusion!
Looking for the right Medical solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
practice fusion Vs. Weadock Software
practice fusion: Our implementation specialists are here to give you as much personal guidance as your practice needs to successfully start using your new EHR.
Weadock Software: RadPix is a radiological teaching file system which can be integrated into a PACS environment. It allows users to send selected images directly from the PACS to a stand-alone teaching file server. Complete radiological teaching files can be created by adding text, annotations and images.
Who is more expensive? Practice fusion or RadPix?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Medical software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Practice fusion and RadPix.
Practice fusion price starts at $149 per provider/month , On a scale between 1 to 10 Practice fusion is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Medical software. RadPix price starts at $199 per license , When comparing RadPix to its competitors, the software is rated 4 - lower than the average Medical software cost.
Bottom line: RadPix is more expensive than Practice fusion.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared Practice fusion Vs. RadPix based on some of the most important and required Medical features.
Practice fusion: this software is considered "feature-rich" with more than 10 important features, here is a partial list: Basic Reports, Data Import/Export, Online Customer Support, Appointment Management, Charting, E-Prescribing, HIPAA Compliant, Medication history.
RadPix: We are still working to collect the list of features for RadPix.
Target customer size
Practice Fusion Medical Software serves a wide range of healthcare providers, including primary care physicians, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and specialists such as dermatologists, psychiatrists, and oncologists. and RadPix's target customer size include: Small, medium and large size businesses.