Compare Quick Practice and Infor Birst - Feb 2023

Shlomi LaviShlomi Lavi / Feb 20, 2023

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - Quick Practice or Infor Birst?

Quick Practice is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Infor Birst, and Infor Birst is rated with the same score (92/100) as Quick Practice (92/100). Infor Birst offers users more features (25) than Quick Practice (0). There is a clear winner in this case and it is Infor Birst!

Looking for the right Medical solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

QuickPractice Vs. Birst

QuickPractice: QuickPractice has been very busy for the past 20 years designing, improving and refining our healthcare practice management and billing software. We focus on making it easier for doctors to control and manage their practices by giving them the time and money-saving tools they need. QuickPractice creates quick and cost-effective solutions to help pr...

Birst: Birst is among the fastest growing business-to-business software providers. Selling directly to businesses as well as other software vendors who seek to embed analytics into their applications, more than 1,000 organizations currently rely upon Birst for their business analytics needs.

Who is more expensive? Quick Practice or Birst?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Medical software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Quick Practice and Birst.

Quick Practice price starts at $599 per license , On a scale between 1 to 10 QuickPractice is rated 6, which is similar to the average cost of Medical software. Birst price starts at $30,000 per 20 users/year , When comparing Birst to its competitors, the software is rated 4 - lower than the average Medical software cost.

Bottom line: Quick Practice is more expensive than Birst.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared Quick Practice Vs. Infor Birst based on some of the most important and required Medical features.

Quick Practice: We are still working to collect the list of features for Quick Practice.

Birst: Ad-Hoc Analysis, Ad-Hoc Reporting, Automatic Scheduled Reporting, Customizable Dashboard, Customizable Features.

Target customer size

QuickPractice Medical software primarily serves healthcare providers, including medical practices, clinics, hospitals, and other healthcare organizations. Birst is a web-based service that can be useful to customers in all types of organizations and industries.

Quick Practice

ITQlick rating
(4.7/5)

starts at $599 per license

QuickPractice software is a cloud-hosted EMR and Practice management solution designed for health practices and billing companies. The platform offers multiple features such as patient records/charting, insuran...

Categories: Billing & Invoicing, Document Management, Medical, Patient Billing Estimate.

Infor Birst

ITQlick rating
(4/5)

starts at $30,000 per 20 users/year

Birst is a Business Intelligence and analytics platform for medium to large businesses. Its key features include ad hoc reporting, charting, data import and export, visual analytics, customer service analytics,...

Categories: Business Intelligence, Business performance management, Dashboards & KPIs, Reporting, KPI.

Compare specifications

Compare features

Quick Practice: 0 Features

We are working to collect the list of features

Birst: 25 Features

Ad-Hoc Analysis
Ad-Hoc Reporting
Automatic Scheduled Reporting
Customizable Dashboard
Customizable Features
Dashboarding
Graphic Benchmark
Performance Measurements
Predictive-Analysis
Trend Indicators
Ad-Hoc Analysis
Ad-Hoc Reporting
Automatic Scheduled Reporting
Customizable Dashboard
Customizable Features
Dashboarding
Graphic Benchmark
Performance Measurements
Predictive-Analysis
Profit Analysis
Trend Indicators
Data visualization
Data warehouses
Collaboration Management
Document Indexing
ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
ITQlick score ITQlick Score is a 1 to 100, the calculation is based on pricing, and functionality Vs. alternative solutions
Pricing score pricing Score is a 1 to 10 (10 is high cost), based on the TCO (cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
Functionality score
Software review
Compare
Quick Pr...
ITQlick rating
4.7/5
Score
92/100
Pricing
6.8/10
License pricing
$599 per license
Functionality
7
Compare
Infor Bi...
ITQlick rating
4/5
Score
92/100
Pricing
5.6/10
License pricing
$30,000 per 20 users/year
Functionality
43
NextGen ...
ITQlick rating
4.5/5
Score
99/100
Pricing
2/10
License pricing
$299 per provider/month
Functionality
20
Practice...
ITQlick rating
4.5/5
Score
99/100
Pricing
2.6/10
License pricing
$149 per provider/month
Functionality
41
WebPT
ITQlick rating
4.4/5
Score
98/100
Pricing
4/10
License pricing
$3 per provider/day
Functionality
30
Review

Auditor - Shlomi Lavi

Website Linkedin profile Facebook Twitter

Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.