Shlomi Lavi /
May 24, 2022
We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - Saba or Dead Simple Screen Sharing?
Dead Simple Screen Sharing is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Saba, and Saba is rated higher (93/100) than Dead Simple Screen Sharing (84/100). Saba offers users more features (6) than Dead Simple Screen Sharing (1). There is a clear winner in this case and it is Saba!
Looking for the right Conference Calling solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
Saba Centra Vs. Dead Simple Screen Sharing
Saba Centra: Saba (NASDAQ: SABA) enables organizations to transform the way they work by leveraging social networking capabilities and the ubiquity of mobile to empower an organization's most mission-critical assets - its people. The company provides a set of people-centric enterprise solutions to various businesses and industries worldwide. Saba delivers cloud...
Dead Simple Screen Sharing: Hi
I am Ali Asgher co-founder of Dead Simple Screen Sharing, I was doing a bit of research and found your website: ITQlick. I learned that you conduct reviews of software products and I would like to suggest our product for review. I think it will be a great fit for your readers.
Dead Simple Screen Sharing is basically a screen sharing and...
Who is more expensive? Saba or Dead Simple Screen Sharing?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Conference Calling software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Saba and Dead Simple Screen Sharing.
Saba price starts at $19 per user/month , On a scale between 1 to 10 Saba is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Conference Calling software. Dead Simple Screen Sharing price starts at $9 per month , When comparing Dead Simple Screen Sharing to its competitors, the software is rated 4 - lower than the average Conference Calling software cost.
Bottom line: Dead Simple Screen Sharing is more expensive than Saba.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared Saba Vs. Dead Simple Screen Sharing based on some of the most important and required Conference Calling features.
Saba: LMS, Recruiting Management, Blended Learning, eLearning, Application Sharing, eCommerce.
Dead Simple Screen Sharing: Chat.
Target customer size
Customers of the software hail from all major industries and form different walks of professional life. and Dead Simple Screen Sharing's target customer size include: Small businesses and start ups.