Shlomi Lavi /
Apr 22, 2022
We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - Saba or Grasshopper?
Grasshopper is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Saba, and Saba is rated higher (93/100) than Grasshopper (85/100). Saba offers users more features (6) than Grasshopper (3). There is a clear winner in this case and it is Saba!
Looking for the right Conference Calling solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
Saba Centra Vs. Grasshopper Inc.
Saba Centra: Saba (NASDAQ: SABA) enables organizations to transform the way they work by leveraging social networking capabilities and the ubiquity of mobile to empower an organization's most mission-critical assets - its people. The company provides a set of people-centric enterprise solutions to various businesses and industries worldwide. Saba delivers cloud...
Grasshopper Inc.: Founded by two entrepreneurs, Grasshopper has been making it easier to start and grow a small business since 2003. Back then, we started as just two guys with a dream and to date have served over 100,000 entrepreneurs (and we're still growing).
The Grasshopper virtual phone system helps entrepreneurs sound more professional and stay connected fr...
Who is more expensive? Saba or Grasshopper?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Conference Calling software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Saba and Grasshopper.
Saba price starts at $19 per user/month , On a scale between 1 to 10 Saba is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Conference Calling software. Grasshopper price starts at $26 per month , When comparing Grasshopper to its competitors, the software is rated 4 - lower than the average Conference Calling software cost.
Bottom line: Grasshopper is more expensive than Saba.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared Saba Vs. Grasshopper based on some of the most important and required Conference Calling features.
Saba: LMS, Recruiting Management, Blended Learning, eLearning, Application Sharing, eCommerce.
Grasshopper: Data Import/Export, Basic Reports, Online Customer Support.
Target customer size
Customers of the software hail from all major industries and form different walks of professional life. Mainly the software has been deployed in small and medium businesses, although it can also
be used for large businesses in some cases.