Shlomi Lavi /
Oct 19, 2022
We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - solo or Attendance on Demand?
solo is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Attendance on Demand, and Attendance on Demand is rated higher (82/100) than solo (80/100). Attendance on Demand offers users more features (4) than solo (0). There is a clear winner in this case and it is Attendance on Demand!
Looking for the right Time Tracking solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
Thrive Vs. Attendance on Demand Inc.
Thrive: Currently Founder and Product Designer at Thrive, a fast growing cloud software company based in the UK. In what seems a lifetime ago I had a successful career as a graphic designer.
Thrive was born from my drive to create beautiful but functional software. I'm focussed with an analytical mind, enjoying the role of problem solver.
Attendance on Demand Inc.: Attendance on Demand is a rapidly deployed, cloud-based time and attendance system that minimizes a company’s risk and technology investment while providing advanced features for securely managing labor data. With over 30 years in the time and attendance industry, the company’s founders have evolved product offerings from mechanical time clocks to ...
Who is more expensive? solo or Attendance on Demand?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Time Tracking software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for solo and Attendance on Demand.
solo price starts at $19 per user/month , On a scale between 1 to 10 solo is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Time Tracking software. Attendance on Demand price starts at $2 per employee/month , When comparing Attendance on Demand to its competitors, the software is rated 2 - much lower than the average Time Tracking software cost.
Bottom line: solo is more expensive than Attendance on Demand.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared solo Vs. Attendance on Demand based on some of the most important and required Time Tracking features.
solo: We are still working to collect the list of features for solo.
Attendance on Demand: Employee Scheduling, Offline Timesheets, Online Timesheets, Attendance Tracking.
Target customer size
solo's typical customers include: Small, medium and large size businesses, and Attendance on Demand's target customer size include: SMBs.