Therabill Vs EZClaim (Jul 2020)
Shlomi Lavi / Jul 14, 2020
We publish unbiased reviews, our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. Learn more in our advertiser disclosure.
Bottom Line: Which is Better - Therabill or EZClaim?
EZClaim is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Therabill, Therabill is rated higher (94/100) than EZClaim (84/100). Both tools offer the same amount of features.
Looking for the right Medical Billing solution for your business? buyers like you are primarily concerned about the real total implementation cost (TCO), full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, pros and cons. In this article we compare between the 2 software products:
How Therabill compares with EZClaim?
Therabill: Our mission is simple: To maintain a simple and affordable therapy practice management solution. "When I first signed up, I was unsure of whether Therabill would meet my needs. The price was much lower than any other software I had looked at. After using Therabill, I have found that Therabill has all of the features that I need. I am quite im...
EZClaim: EZClaim has been in the forefront of the medical billing software industry since 1997 specializing in medical billing and scheduling software and is based in Rochester, MI. EZClaim Medical Billing Software is a cost effective and easy-to-use medical billing and scheduling practice management system for the small to medium size provider office. ...
Who's more expensive? Therabill or EZClaim?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Medical Billing software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance & support and other related services. When calculating the TCO it's important to add all of these "hidden cost" as well. We prepared a TCO calculator for Therabill and EZClaim.
Therabill price starts at $149 per provider , on a scale between 1 to 10 Therabill is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Medical Billing software. EZClaim price starts at $139 per user/month , when comparing EZClaim to their competitors, the software is rated 6 - similar to the average Medical Billing software cost.
Bottom line:EZClaim is more expensive than Therabill.
Which software includes more/better features?
As with any business software solutions, it’s important to consider the features & functionality. The tool should support the processes, workflows, reports and needs that matter to your team. To help you evaluate this, we've compared Therabill Vs. EZClaim based on some of the most important and required Medical Billing features. Therabill: Billing & Invoicing, Appointment Management, HIPAA Compliant. EZClaim: Compliance , Medical, Medical.
Target customer size
Therabill is suitable for solo therapists and group practices and also supports managing multiple offices. The software is a useful solution for medical businesses and practices of all sizes and a wide range of types.
Compare specifications
Therabill Specifications
ITQlick Score: | 94/100 |
---|---|
ITQlick Rating: | (4.4/5) |
Pricing: | 2/10 - low cost |
Category: | Medical Billing -> Therabill |
Company: | Therabill |
Pricing: | starts at $149 per provider |
Typical customers: | Small, medium and large size businesses |
Platforms: | Desktop, Mobile, Cloud |
Links: | Therabill review, Therabill pricing, Therabill alternatives |
EZClaim Specifications
ITQlick Score: | 84/100 |
---|---|
ITQlick Rating: | (4.7/5) |
Pricing: | 6/10 - average cost |
Category: | Medical Billing -> EZClaim |
Company: | EZClaim |
Pricing: | starts at $139 per user/month |
Typical customers: | SMBs |
Platforms: | Desktop, Mobile, Cloud |
Links: | EZClaim review, EZClaim pricing, EZClaim alternatives |
Compare features
Therabill: 3 Features
EZClaim: 3 Features
Author

Shlomi Lavi
Shlomi holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information System Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 15 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant, and implementation expert for small, medium and large size (global) companies.