Compare URC CIMS and BuilderTREND - Mar 2022

Shlomi LaviShlomi Lavi / Mar 08, 2022

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - URC CIMS or BuilderTREND?

URC CIMS is more expensive to implement (TCO) than BuilderTREND, and BuilderTREND is rated higher (97/100) than URC CIMS (62/100). BuilderTREND offers users more features (18) than URC CIMS (0). There is a clear winner in this case and it is BuilderTREND!

Looking for the right Construction solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

URC Infotec Vs. BUILDERTREND SOLUTIONS, INC.

URC Infotec: URC Infotec [URCI] is a team of young and energetic techno-entrepreneurs, engaged in designing, developing and deploying enterprise systems and solutions [ESS], both as products and services. Driven by innovative ideas and creative work, we have been able to build and offer highly customized and customizable ESS to help enterprises manage their res...

BUILDERTREND SOLUTIONS, INC.: BuilderTREND provides web-based home builder software to optimize communication between the builders, their customers, vendors, and subcontractors.The BuilderTREND web-based project management software empowers home builders and remodelers to provide a better building experience for their homebuyers, associates, and subcontractors. The system provi...

Who is more expensive? URC CIMS or BuilderTREND?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Construction software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for URC CIMS and BuilderTREND.

URC CIMS price starts at $25,000 per license , On a scale between 1 to 10 URC CIMS is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Construction software. BuilderTREND price starts at $99 per month , When comparing BuilderTREND to its competitors, the software is rated 2 - much lower than the average Construction software cost.

Bottom line: URC CIMS is more expensive than BuilderTREND.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared URC CIMS Vs. BuilderTREND based on some of the most important and required Construction features.

URC CIMS: We are still working to collect the list of features for URC CIMS.

BuilderTREND: Budget & Expense Management, Collaboration, Document Management, Project Management, Scheduling.

Target customer size

URC CIMS's typical customers include: Medium and large size businesses, BuilderTREND is perfect for construction firms of all types as well as dimensions, from remodelers and household contractors to production home building contractors and also layout or construction business that want streamlining their building procedure and their cooperation with affiliates, buyers and subcontractors.

URC CIMS

ITQlick rating
(3.5/5)

starts at $25,000 per license

URC CIMS is an award-winning cloud-based Construction software, it is designed to support medium and large size construction business. URC CIMS received a rating of 3.5 from ITQlick team. The software cost is c...

Categories: Billing & Invoicing, Construction, Construction Accounting & Job Costing, Construction Project Management.

BuilderTREND

ITQlick rating
(4.5/5)

starts at $99 per month

BuilderTREND is a cloud-based construction management solution that is designed to be used by professional individuals and well as businesses in the construction industry. The software is designed with features...

Categories: SIP Clients, Construction, Construction Apps, Construction Project Scheduling, Electrician Apps.

Compare specifications

Compare features

URC CIMS: 0 Features

We are working to collect the list of features

BuilderTREND: 18 Features

Budget & Expense Management
Collaboration
Document Management
Project Management
Scheduling
Collaboration Management
Functions with e-Mail Systems
Mobile Access
Accounting Management
Bidding
Change Orders
Cost Management
Document Management
Electrical
Estimating
Project Management
Punch List
Scheduling
ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
ITQlick score ITQlick Score is a 1 to 100, the calculation is based on pricing, and functionality Vs. alternative solutions
Pricing score pricing Score is a 1 to 10 (10 is high cost), based on the TCO (cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
Functionality score
Software review
Compare
URC CIMS
ITQlick rating
3.5/5
Score
62/100
Pricing
5.8/10
License pricing
$25,000 per license
Functionality
8
Compare
BuilderTREND
ITQlick rating
4.5/5
Score
97/100
Pricing
2/10
License pricing
$99 per month
Functionality
31
Procore
ITQlick rating
4.5/5
Score
99/100
Pricing
2/10
License pricing
$667 per month
Functionality
33
PlanGrid
ITQlick rating
4.6/5
Score
98/100
Pricing
2.6/10
License pricing
$39 per user/month
Functionality
16
CoConstruct
ITQlick rating
4.7/5
Score
97/100
Pricing
2/10
License pricing
$99 per month
Functionality
23

Auditor - Shlomi Lavi

Website Linkedin profile Facebook Twitter

Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.