Compare Whitespark and Conductor Searchlight - Jul 2022

Shlomi Lavi

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - Whitespark or Conductor Searchlight?

Conductor Searchlight is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Whitespark, and Whitespark is rated higher (88/100) than Conductor Searchlight (81/100).

Looking for the right SEO/SEM solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

Whitespark Inc. Vs. Conductor

Whitespark Inc.: Whitespark builds tools and provides services that help businesses and agencies with local search marketing. We live and breathe local SEO and we’re known far and wide for writing and speaking on it.

Conductor: Conductor is a technology company driven by a deep passion for helping marketers. With our software, marketers make smarter decisions every day, from naming their products to creating great content.

Who is more expensive? Whitespark or Conductor Searchlight?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of SEO/SEM software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Whitespark and Conductor Searchlight.

Whitespark price starts at $39 per month , On a scale between 1 to 10 Whitespark Local Citation Finder is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of SEO/SEM software. Conductor Searchlight price starts at $1,995 per month , When comparing Conductor Searchlight to its competitors, the software is rated 6 - similar to the average SEO/SEM software cost.

Bottom line: Conductor Searchlight is more expensive than Whitespark.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared Whitespark Vs. Conductor Searchlight based on some of the most important and required SEO/SEM features.

Whitespark: We are still working to collect the list of features for Whitespark.

Conductor Searchlight: We are still working to collect the list of features for Conductor Searchlight.

Target customer size

Typical customers of this program are small to large local businesses that want to improve their search ranking. The usual clients that use the Conductor Searchlight software are the individuals who own small and/or medium-sized businesses (with one to 100 employees and more than 100 to a thousand employees, respectively) and are benefitting from the services of data hosting, IT and related industry, mainly with SEO and SEM and online marketing.