Shlomi Lavi / Mar 28, 2022We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Whitespark is more expensive to implement (TCO) than SERPs.com, and Whitespark is rated higher (88/100) than SERPs.com (62/100).
Looking for the right SEO/SEM solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
Whitespark Inc.: Whitespark builds tools and provides services that help businesses and agencies with local search marketing. We live and breathe local SEO and we’re known far and wide for writing and speaking on it.
SERPs, Inc.: SERPs.com was founded in 2012 in rainy Portland, OR. Today we track data for over 2m keywords and over 20,000 websites daily and have customers in 93 countries around the world. SERPs is proud to be backed by Rouge Venture Partners and the Portland Seed Fund. Our goal is to build the most powerful platform to help SEOs understand, measure, test ...
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of SEO/SEM software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Whitespark and SERPs.com.
Whitespark price starts at $39 per month , On a scale between 1 to 10 Whitespark Local Citation Finder is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of SEO/SEM software. SERPs.com price starts at $49 per user/month , When comparing SERPs.com to its competitors, the software is rated 4 - lower than the average SEO/SEM software cost.
Bottom line: Whitespark cost is around the same cost of SERPs.com.
We've compared Whitespark Vs. SERPs.com based on some of the most important and required SEO/SEM features.
Whitespark: We are still working to collect the list of features for Whitespark.
SERPs.com: We are still working to collect the list of features for SERPs.com.
Typical customers of this program are small to large local businesses that want to improve their search ranking. The typical users of SERPs.
starts at $39 per month
Whitespark Local Citation Finder is a program that helps improve your search ranking in the local market. Find out where to list your business, as well as the best keywords or key phrases to use to make your na...
Compare Pricingstarts at $49 per user/month
SERPs.com is a web-based search engine optimization/SEO software designed using SEO Research and analytics tools to help users with their digital marketing.
Compare Pricing| ITQlick Score: | 88/100 |
|---|---|
| ITQlick Rating: |
|
| Pricing: | 4/10 - average cost |
| Category: | SEO/SEM -> Whitespark review |
| Company: | Whitespark Inc. |
| Pricing: | starts at $39 per month |
| Typical customers: | Small, medium and large size businesses |
| Platforms: | Desktop, Cloud |
| Links: | Whitespark review, Whitespark pricing, Whitespark alternatives |
| ITQlick Score: | 62/100 |
|---|---|
| ITQlick Rating: |
|
| Pricing: | 4/10 - average cost |
| Category: | SEO/SEM -> SERPs.com review |
| Company: | SERPs, Inc. |
| Pricing: | starts at $49 per user/month |
| Typical customers: | SMBs |
| Platforms: | Desktop, Mobile |
| Links: | SERPs.com review, SERPs.com pricing, SERPs.com alternatives |
Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.