FTMaintenance - Top 13 Alternatives

Shlomi LaviShlomi Lavi / updated: Nov 14, 2021

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. Learn more by reading our advertiser disclosure.

FTMaintenance faces competition with software like Om Trak, UpKeep, FMX, and eWorkOrders CMMS. FTMaintenance is compared with its alternatives in important aspects below:
  • Cost: The pricing for FTMaintenance is not disclosed by its vendor. The software is considered a low-cost solution, rating 1.3 out of a maximum of 5. FMX pricing starts at $35 per user monthly, while the pricing for Om Trak is not disclosed. UpKeep pricing starts at $45 per month, while eWorkOrders CMMS does not have its pricing public.
  • Support: FTMaintenance offers support to its customers through phone support, FAQs, and email channels. UpKeep offers FAQs, knowledge base, chat, phone support, and email. eWorkOrders CMMS offers support like email, phone support, FAQs, and knowledge base.
  • Functionality: In terms of functionality, FTMaintenance and its alternatives have the necessary features needed for maintenance software. Om Trak, however, does not have the billing and invoicing functionalities.
  • Customer/Industries: FTMaintenance targets firms in the manufacturing, facilities, food, power and energy, educational, and government sector. UpKeep targets customers in the manufacturing, health, construction sector. The industrial reach for Om Trak and eWorkOrders is similar to that of FTMaintenance.
  • Cloud/On-Premise: The FTMaintenance software can be deployed as cloud-based and on-premise. In comparison, UpKeep and eWorkOrders CMMS are also cloud-based and on-premise solutions. FMX and Om Trak, on the other hand, are entirely cloud-based.
  • Scalability: FTMaintenance and its alternatives are scalable for companies with employee sizes of over 1000 users.
  • Popularity: FTMaintenance is a growing brand and is used by more than 20000 customers. In comparison, UpKeep has a customer base of over 11000 customers.

2021's Top FTMaintenance Alternatives

Here are the top 4 alternatives to FTMaintenance that are worth checking out: UpKeep for SMBs, Hippo CMMS for large size business, Gusto Software for growing companies, and Asset Bug for startups and SMBs.

ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
Score ITQlick Score is a 1 to 100 score, based on pricing, and functionality Vs. alternative solutions
Pricing pricing Score is a 1 to 10 score, based on the TCO (cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
Functionality
Review
Compare
FTMaintenance
ITQlick rating
4.3/5
Score
94/100
Pricing
2.6/10
License pricing
$40 per month
Functionality
32
Best for SMBs
UpKeep
ITQlick rating
4.7/5
Score
94/100
Pricing
2/10
License pricing
$35 per month
Functionality
22
Review
Best for Enterprise
Hippo
ITQlick rating
4.4/5
Score
93/100
Pricing
2/10
License pricing
$35 per user/month
Functionality
27
Review
Growing
Gusto
ITQlick rating
4.7/5
Score
94/100
Pricing
3.6/10
License pricing
$6 per user/month
Functionality
15
Review
Free version
Asset
ITQlick rating
3.1/5
Score
85/100
Pricing
5.8/10
License pricing
Has a free version
Functionality
3
Review

1. UpKeep - Best for SMBs

UpKeep is an alternative Maintenance software, UpKeep installed on-premises or used cloud based, FTMaintenance can be used on-premises and on the cloud. UpKeep, with a pricing score of 2 is considered less expensive to implement than FTMaintenance with a score of 2.6.

UpKeep is rated 4.7 stars by ITQlick experts, both software products offer a good range of features (UpKeep offers 22 main features). compare head to head: UpKeep Vs FTMaintenance

2. Hippo CMMS - Best for Large Business

Hippo CMMS is an alternative Maintenance software, Hippo CMMS installed on-premises or used cloud based, FTMaintenance can be used on-premises and on the cloud. Hippo CMMS , with a pricing score of 2 is considered less expensive to implement than FTMaintenance with a score of 2.6.

Hippo CMMS is rated 4.4 stars by ITQlick experts, both software products offer a good range of features (Hippo offers 27 main features). compare head to head: Hippo CMMS Vs FTMaintenance

3. Gusto Software - Best for Growing Companies

Gusto Software is an alternative Maintenance software, Gusto Software installed on-premises or used cloud based, FTMaintenance can be used on-premises and on the cloud. Gusto Software, with a pricing score of 3.6 is considered more expensive to implement than FTMaintenance with a score of 2.6.

Gusto Software is rated 4.7 stars by ITQlick experts, both software products offer a good range of features (Gusto offers 15 main features). compare head to head: Gusto Software Vs FTMaintenance

4. Asset Bug - Best for NO Budget or Start up Companies

Asset Bug is an alternative Maintenance software, Asset Bug cloud, FTMaintenance can be used on-premises and on the cloud. Asset Bug, with a pricing score of 5.8 is considered more expensive to implement than FTMaintenance with a score of 2.6.

Asset Bug is rated 3.1 stars by ITQlick experts, both software products offer a good range of features (Asset offers 3 main features). compare head to head: Asset Bug Vs FTMaintenance

5. FIIX CMMS

FIIX CMMS is an alternative Maintenance software, FIIX CMMS installed on-premises or used cloud based, FTMaintenance can be used on-premises and on the cloud. FIIX CMMS, with a pricing score of 3 is considered more expensive to implement than FTMaintenance with a score of 2.6.

FIIX CMMS is rated 4.5 stars by ITQlick experts, both software products offer a good range of features (FIIX offers 30 main features). compare head to head: FIIX CMMS Vs FTMaintenance

6. Maximo

Maximo is an alternative Maintenance software, Maximo installed on-premises, FTMaintenance can be used on-premises and on the cloud. Maximo, with a pricing score of 4.4 is considered more expensive to implement than FTMaintenance with a score of 2.6.

Maximo is rated 5 stars by ITQlick experts, both software products offer a good range of features (Maximo offers 6 main features). compare head to head: Maximo Vs FTMaintenance

7. MIR-RT

MIR-RT is an alternative Maintenance software, MIR-RT used on the cloud, FTMaintenance can be used on-premises and on the cloud. MIR-RT, with a pricing score of 4 is considered more expensive to implement than FTMaintenance with a score of 2.6.

MIR-RT is rated 4.2 stars by ITQlick experts, both software products offer a good range of features (MIR-RT offers 7 main features). compare head to head: MIR-RT Vs FTMaintenance

8. eMaint CMMS

eMaint CMMS is an alternative Maintenance software, eMaint CMMS installed on-premises or used cloud based, FTMaintenance can be used on-premises and on the cloud. eMaint CMMS, with a pricing score of 2 is considered less expensive to implement than FTMaintenance with a score of 2.6.

eMaint CMMS is rated 4.5 stars by ITQlick experts, both software products offer a good range of features (eMaint offers 21 main features). compare head to head: eMaint CMMS Vs FTMaintenance

9. TechWare MainTrac

TechWare MainTrac is an alternative Maintenance software, TechWare MainTrac installed on-premises, FTMaintenance can be used on-premises and on the cloud. TechWare MainTrac, with a pricing score of 3.6 is considered more expensive to implement than FTMaintenance with a score of 2.6.

TechWare MainTrac is rated 3.2 stars by ITQlick experts, both software products offer a good range of features (TechWare offers 3 main features). compare head to head: TechWare MainTrac Vs FTMaintenance

10. EAM-CMMS Software

EAM-CMMS Software is an alternative Maintenance software, EAM-CMMS Software used on the cloud, FTMaintenance can be used on-premises and on the cloud. EAM-CMMS Software, with a pricing score of 5.6 is considered more expensive to implement than FTMaintenance with a score of 2.6.

EAM-CMMS Software is rated 3.9 stars by ITQlick experts, both software products offer a good range of features (EAM-CMMS offers 8 main features). compare head to head: EAM-CMMS Software Vs FTMaintenance

11. Facilities Management eXpress

Facilities Management eXpress is an alternative Maintenance software, Facilities Management eXpress installed on-premises or used cloud based, FTMaintenance can be used on-premises and on the cloud. Facilities Management eXpress, with a pricing score of 2 is considered less expensive to implement than FTMaintenance with a score of 2.6.

Facilities Management eXpress is rated 4.7 stars by ITQlick experts, both software products offer a good range of features (Facilities offers 5 main features). compare head to head: Facilities Management eXpress Vs FTMaintenance

12. MaintenanceEssentials Pro

MaintenanceEssentials Pro is an alternative Maintenance software, MaintenanceEssentials Pro installed on-premises or used cloud based, FTMaintenance can be used on-premises and on the cloud. MaintenanceEssentials Pro, with a pricing score of 3 is considered more expensive to implement than FTMaintenance with a score of 2.6.

MaintenanceEssentials Pro is rated 4.6 stars by ITQlick experts, both software products offer a good range of features (MaintenanceEssentials offers 9 main features). compare head to head: MaintenanceEssentials Pro Vs FTMaintenance

13. MaintSmart CMMS

MaintSmart CMMS is an alternative Maintenance software, MaintSmart CMMS used on the cloud, FTMaintenance can be used on-premises and on the cloud. MaintSmart CMMS, with a pricing score of 3.8 is considered more expensive to implement than FTMaintenance with a score of 2.6.

MaintSmart CMMS is rated 4.7 stars by ITQlick experts, both software products offer a good range of features (MaintSmart offers 3 main features). compare head to head: MaintSmart CMMS Vs FTMaintenance

Author

Shlomi Lavi

Website Linkedin Facebook Twitter

Shlomi holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information System Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 15 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant, and implementation expert for small, medium and large size (global) companies.